Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

So im looking to put missile launchers on my devastator.
do i need the devastator backpack or can i use a regular pack for it to be tounry legal?
i have missile launchers from tactical squads and trading but dont have the back packs for the missile launcher dev teams, if that makes sense.

The back pack isn't necessary...
It looks nice but it isn't vital.

As a general rule of thumb if a model looks like hes holding something that looks similar to what you are going for you should be fine for WYSIWYG. You dont' have to actaully have the missile launcher or combi-melta, relic blade, ect, ect bit itself but you need to be able to see what a unit is holding just by looking at it. So if the guy is holding what looks like it could be a missile launcher you should be fine even without the backpack on. This means you can chop up bits or use green stuff and other things to represent weapons that are pretty hard to find.

As long as he has a rocket in a tube you should be fine. If you have any hunter-killer missiles from vehicles, they can work with a bit of surgery.

Looks cool, but without, only a beardy mcneckbeard would complain.

thanks, i just dont want to spend 15 dollars per devastator missile launcher set up that would be pretty bad i could buy more units with that kind of cash.