Switch Theme:

Astroth the Grim and GK Perfect Warrior  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut





Don't have the codex with me, but in the BA codex the "Astroth the Grim" character makes you reroll successful invuls. A GK Perfect warrior can reroll saves.

So if the Astroth and crowe where in battle, and crowe decided to use blade shield, would you

A. Roll the dice, and then reroll no matter the result taking the second roll
B. Roll the dice once and take it, knowing that a reroll has the same chance..

Thoughts? Am I missing something that makes it so that rerolling is a must?
   
Made in us
Ship's Officer






invisiblade wrote:Don't have the codex with me, but in the BA codex the "Astroth the Grim" character makes you reroll successful invuls. A GK Perfect warrior can reroll saves.

So if the Astroth and crowe where in battle, and crowe decided to use blade shield, would you

A. Roll the dice, and then reroll no matter the result taking the second roll
B. Roll the dice once and take it, knowing that a reroll has the same chance..

Thoughts? Am I missing something that makes it so that rerolling is a must?


Statistically these are the same, but many players (myself included) play A. Mostly it's a matter of balancing out some of the hideously skewed "first-roll" luck a couple of our players have.

Ask Not, Fear Not - (Gallery), ,

 H.B.M.C. wrote:

Yeah! Who needs balanced rules when everyone can take giant stompy robots! Balanced rules are just for TFG WAAC players, and everyone hates them.

- This message brought to you by the Dakka Casual Gaming Mafia: 'Cause winning is for losers!
 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




They are both identical options, so pick whichever makes sense. Its been the same since 5th edition started with nullzone and fortune (and perils..)
   
Made in gb
Lord of the Fleet






London

Like Nos said, there are other examples of this, such as Fateweaver and Null Zone, so you can either roll all saves, then re-roll them regardless of their result, or you can just agree that the results cancel each other out and roll once, which would save a bit of time.
   
Made in gb
Elite Tyranid Warrior





Best to talk to your opponent about it before rolling any saves, just so everyone is on the same page.
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





Rolling once saves time and produces the same result.

"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."

This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.


Freelance Ontologist

When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. 
   
Made in za
Reverent Tech-Adept






Baal

I'm gonna go with option A.

Smeugal Fan. For some reson i feel that i am in the wrong place  
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




Why wouldn't you roll all of the saves you're required to take, then Astorath makes you reroll the successful ones and Crowe rerolls the failed saves?

For example:

5 Wounds, roll saves: 3 succeed, 2 fail.
Astorath makes you reroll the 3,
Crowe rerolls the 2.
Use the results. Both rules have applied and no re-rolling rerolls has occured. If you were to succeed on all of them the first roll, Crowe's ability wouldn't apply and vice versa.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/06/23 13:13:21


 
   
Made in us
Furious Fire Dragon





Angelic wrote:Why wouldn't you roll all of the saves you're required to take, then Astorath makes you reroll the successful ones and Crowe rerolls the failed saves?

For example:

5 Wounds, roll saves: 3 succeed, 2 fail.
Astorath makes you reroll the 3,
Crowe rerolls the 2.
Use the results. Both rules have applied and no re-rolling rerolls has occured. If you were to succeed on all of them the first roll, Crowe's ability wouldn't apply and vice versa.

... and the end result of this is that you roll N dice, pick them up without taking any results and reroll them. Mathematically, this is the same as just accepting the first roll. Those who believe in voodoo will roll all dice twice, ignoring the first set of results.

Homer

The only "hobby" GW is interested in is lining their pockets with your money.
 
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




Homer S wrote:
Angelic wrote:Why wouldn't you roll all of the saves you're required to take, then Astorath makes you reroll the successful ones and Crowe rerolls the failed saves?

For example:

5 Wounds, roll saves: 3 succeed, 2 fail.
Astorath makes you reroll the 3,
Crowe rerolls the 2.
Use the results. Both rules have applied and no re-rolling rerolls has occured. If you were to succeed on all of them the first roll, Crowe's ability wouldn't apply and vice versa.

... and the end result of this is that you roll N dice, pick them up without taking any results and reroll them. Mathematically, this is the same as just accepting the first roll. Those who believe in voodoo will roll all dice twice, ignoring the first set of results.

Homer

Wait, there are gamers who don't believe in voodoo?
I should have read more carefully. I misunderstood what the OP was saying. But as an aside to option b, if all we did was rely on statistics, then why have dice?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/06/23 18:02:36


 
   
Made in us
Been Around the Block




I may be wrong but i was reading the other day and i believe blade shield only affects armor saves, which are different from invun saves. please correct me if I'm wrong because a lonewolf punked Crowe like a 2 dollar whore....
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





Lennysfury wrote:I may be wrong but i was reading the other day and i believe blade shield only affects armor saves,

You're wrong.

"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."

This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.


Freelance Ontologist

When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




Where did you read this? The GK codex is very clear that it is all saves.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: