Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

What do you think is the worst site on the internet?
As in, what website has the most idiocy, the most spam, the most crude & immature humour, hateful messages, and anything like that.
The two things that immediately spring to mind are 4chan (and all associated sites) and Conservapedia.
What are your thoughts?

Easily 4chan.

Or plant-care.com. That place is a hive of filth and infantile depravity.

Mumsnet.

[insert random porn website]

I hate it. Look for something at google images, and get a link to it. If you 'acciddently' click on it, you get spammy stuff everywhere.

Dakkadakka!

ZING!

Agreed. Since Im on it and posting, it has been very bad.

This one.

The GW-haters grind my gears.

thenoobbomb wrote:Agreed. Since Im on it and posting, it has been very bad.

Don't be so hard on yourself. Plenty of folks drag Dakka down, not just you.

Henners91 wrote:This one.

The GW-haters grind my gears.

That's some seriously masochistic tendencies right there, then. But seriously, if you think this is bad, you should see the Aspidistra haters on plant-care.com, or the constant war between Orchid apologists and haters.

Scientiology.org....
Most Teenager Blogs
Warseer (lots of viruses)
4chan beats any website in history it has every social reject in the world put into one place.

htj wrote:Or plant-care.com. That place is a hive of filth and infantile depravity.

Surely not this plant-care?

http://www.plant-care.com/

Asherian Command wrote:Scientiology.org....

Agreed.
"So...You want to follow our beliefs?"
"Yup, coz I totally believe that I'm secretly immortal and I need to remember it."
"OK. Then first cut off all relations to your friends and families and give us $5000 towards suing random people we don't like. It's so magical!"

4chan beats any website in history it has every social reject in the world put into one place.

Couldn't that be said about any wargaming forum?

DickBandit wrote:Dakkadakka!

ZING!

Funny, I would have said this:

http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/forums/show/54.page

Facebook

Melissa's blog.

*Guffaw*

Of all time? Geocities. Thankfully, they closed that monstrosity down.

Currently? Myspace.

I would say any hippie/environmentalist website, such as greenpeace's, Sierra Clubs, etc.

dajobe wrote:I would say any hippie/environmentalist website, such as greenpeace's, Sierra Clubs, etc.

I would say any douche with a website denying humanity's impact upon the planet.

I fething hate those cretins.

dajobe wrote:I would say any hippie/environmentalist website, such as greenpeace's, Sierra Clubs, etc.

Hmmm, may I ask why?

I'm just curious as to what problem you have with trying to limit the destruction that we as humans wreak upon our natural surroundings.

Toastedandy wrote:

htj wrote:Or plant-care.com. That place is a hive of filth and infantile depravity.

Surely not this plant-care?

http://www.plant-care.com/

I might be being a little bit disingenuous there. That is to say, I'm lying.

dajobe wrote:I would say any hippie/environmentalist website, such as greenpeace's, Sierra Clubs, etc.

Obviously you've never seen the depths of hate from DU.

MeanGreenStompa wrote:

dajobe wrote:I would say any hippie/environmentalist website, such as greenpeace's, Sierra Clubs, etc.

I would say any douche with a website denying humanity's impact upon the planet.

I fething hate those cretins.

well that is also very true, people that deny our impact are also complete fools, i believe in somewhere in the middle, but many of these organizations are completely irrational. They think that all industry must be stopped immediatly(which is both unrealistic and would cripple the worlds economies if these people had their way), and there is no middle ground with both extreme sides of the arguement. I try to not deal with radicals.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

rubiksnoob wrote:

dajobe wrote:I would say any hippie/environmentalist website, such as greenpeace's, Sierra Clubs, etc.

Hmmm, may I ask why?

I'm just curious as to what problem you have with trying to limit the destruction that we as humans wreak upon our natural surroundings.

I fully believe that humans SHOULD find other energy sources, and that it is very important, I am a boy scout and love this earth and its beauty and realise that it needs to be preserved. But I also realise that if these organizations had their way, all of the economies of the world would be fethed, and that would lead to society being fethed. Once again, I am for moving away from coal and gas and oil, ONCE IT BECOMES REALISTIC AND VIABLE, these organizations want it done now, and that would destroy us.

these organizations dont seek a limit of destruction. They seek the destruction of business(indirectly) which is what i am against.

@dajobe
None of these organisations are asking for all big buissenesses to be shut down. They're saying to try and limit their impact on the environment. If that would destroy a company, then that company is obviously making terrible decisions.
But anyway, that's off topic. On topic, the sheer idioticness to be found on Conservapedia and Westboro Baptist.net makes my head spin. I don't understand how evolution could allow these cretins to exist.

Trollpie, i work at a coal company, my family works at a coal company, I have had these organizations come into my building and police officers have to be here to make sure they dont burn down the building(yes that has happened to other companies). I have seen and read of the things these organizations want of the coal industry, it amounts to shutting down the industry. An industry that happens to provide 90% of the worlds power. As i said, I am all for getting away from coal and oil eventually, once it becomes realistic, which takes research and time, and immediate actions are not realistic.

Obviously you do not know of the laws and limitations that these organizations lobby for. You do not know of the ridiculous limitations that the EPA passes, I am all for regulation, but they have to be realistic and feasible.

Worst...

I would say: stormfront.org

godhatesfags.com

I can't believe I'm the first to post this.

Close second is 4chan, and then Warseer.

<text edited to break hyperlink; let's try not to create easy links to things we don't want people to follow, please, and remember that Dakka is PG-13 --Janthkin>

dajobe wrote:

I fully believe that humans SHOULD find other energy sources, and that it is very important, I am a boy scout and love this earth and its beauty and realise that it needs to be preserved. But I also realise that if these organizations had their way, all of the economies of the world would be fethed, and that would lead to society being fethed. Once again, I am for moving away from coal and gas and oil, ONCE IT BECOMES REALISTIC AND VIABLE, these organizations want it done now, and that would destroy us.

these organizations dont seek a limit of destruction. They seek the destruction of business(indirectly) which is what i am against.

Now that's all fine and good, and you're right; if the entire world stopped using fossil fuels tomorrow things would go downhill very quickly. But that is not an argument for no regulation of fossil fuel industries such as coal, gas, and oil. Until the day comes that we no longer need fossil fuels, we need to make sure we do as little additional damage to the environment than has already been done. That means regulation of industries that damage the environment. We've only go one planet and it sure would be sad if we completely crapped it up because at the time we considered business more important than sustainability.

Surely the never-updated 1996 Space Jam website?

http://www2.warnerbros.com/spacejam/movie/jam.htm



True Christians Unite was a forum we discovered back around 02 or 03

http://truechristiansunite.yuku.com/

It was basically a complete troll site. No matter what you post there the regulars would post something far worse from the most depraved dreams of God and gun loving rednecks. Until you catch on to the joke in which case they would delete your post and ban you waiting for the next sucker to come along.

rubiksnoob wrote:

dajobe wrote:

I fully believe that humans SHOULD find other energy sources, and that it is very important, I am a boy scout and love this earth and its beauty and realise that it needs to be preserved. But I also realise that if these organizations had their way, all of the economies of the world would be fethed, and that would lead to society being fethed. Once again, I am for moving away from coal and gas and oil, ONCE IT BECOMES REALISTIC AND VIABLE, these organizations want it done now, and that would destroy us.

these organizations dont seek a limit of destruction. They seek the destruction of business(indirectly) which is what i am against.

Now that's all fine and good, and you're right; if the entire world stopped using fossil fuels tomorrow things would go downhill very quickly. But that is not an argument for no regulation of fossil fuel industries such as coal, gas, and oil. Until the day comes that we no longer need fossil fuels, we need to make sure we do as little additional damage to the environment than has already been done. That means regulation of industries that damage the environment. We've only go one planet and it sure would be sad if we completely crapped it up because at the time we considered business more important than sustainability.

i didnt say no regulation, i am saying that the ones that the environmentalists often push for are too severe to allow a business to function.

As a web designer, it really bugs me when I go to a site that looks like crap. Even people that aren't designers and have limited HTML experience can put together something nice if they really try.. and in this day and age every other ISP is offering template sites that are easy to customize, so there's really no excuse for crappy design, other than the person designing it just not caring.