Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Once again the US proves its uber dominance of all things non Haggis related. Germany's out. Brazil's out. Fear de American wimminz!

http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2011/07/10/us-defeats-brazil-in-dramatic-womens-world-cup-game/?test=faces

It's football you damn colonists...
Women's football is pretty underrated to be honest...

That's damn right you aren't uber dominant in Haggis related things, else I would kill you all with my Claymore.

Yeah, women's soccer in the USA is of a high standard. It's way more widely played by lesb..uh, I mean girls, over there than it is over here.

Albatross wrote:Yeah, women's soccer in the USA is of a high standard. It's way more widely played by lesb..uh, I mean girls, over there than it is over here.

Who plays women's soccer over in the UK? Beardless men?

Premiership footballers, amiright?

malfred wrote:

Albatross wrote:Yeah, women's soccer in the USA is of a high standard. It's way more widely played by lesb..uh, I mean girls, over there than it is over here.

Who plays women's soccer over in the UK? Beardless men?

No Although some of the women could be classed as men from a quick glance

Albatross wrote:Yeah, women's soccer in the USA is of a high standard. It's way more widely played by lesb..uh, I mean girls, over there than it is over here.

Did you really just say that?

Everyone knows the women of the woman loving persuasion play lacrosse and softball.

C'mon Alby, get with the program!

No, no, no, you all have it wrong.












The manly women all play rugby.

Albatross wrote:Yeah, women's soccer in the USA is of a high standard. It's way more widely played by lesb..uh, I mean girls, over there than it is over here.

In hierarchy of attractive female athletes football is second only to volleyball.

Its hockey and rugby over here.

Had a mate in my uni team stipped and all his clothes thrown on a chanderlier about 15 foot in the air by a team of female hockey players.

His protests, screams, pleading for help will go to my grave with me as much as our laughter that drowned it out.

Back on topic, I saw some of the Fance vs England game the other day it was dire.

Albatross wrote:Premiership footballers, amiright?

ZING!

I would say that the #1 attractive mainstream girl sport is beach volleyball . soccer has some nice looking ladies, and so does tennis!

some of the sports that are more known for the more manly ladies include hockey and rugby, sometimes lacrosse(but not always)
and softball girls usually=

It's womens football, no one cares. XD

Soladrin wrote:It's womens football, no one cares. XD

inoright? It's like women's basketball. No one gives a

LordofHats wrote:

Soladrin wrote:It's womens football, no one cares. XD

inoright? It's like women's basketball. No one gives a

To be fair, basketball is a lame sport regardless of who's playing it.

dogma wrote:

Albatross wrote:Yeah, women's soccer in the USA is of a high standard. It's way more widely played by lesb..uh, I mean girls, over there than it is over here.

In hierarchy of attractive female athletes football is second only to volleyball.

Huh, maybe in America! Over here, football is played by mingers.


And quite right, too.

LordofHats wrote:

Soladrin wrote:It's womens football, no one cares. XD

inoright? It's like women's basketball. No one gives a

All 37 of the fans at the WNBA All Star game are mad at you!

Cheesecat wrote:

LordofHats wrote:

Soladrin wrote:It's womens football, no one cares. XD

inoright? It's like women's basketball. No one gives a

To be fair, basketball is a lame sport regardless of who's playing it.

QFT, basketball(other than march madness) sucks in general

Stormrider wrote:

LordofHats wrote:

Soladrin wrote:It's womens football, no one cares. XD

inoright? It's like women's basketball. No one gives a

All 37 of the fans at the WNBA All Star game are mad at you!

One can quickly tell who doesn't have daughters, or wives, or girlfriends who were athletic. Its kind of sad.

Ah, so I assume the US male football team will do just as well then?

Interesting the vehemence to defend use of the word 'football' for the game in which you tend to hold the ball in your hands for the most part. Should've called it American Rugby, really. Then those wacky Yanks could call rugby something else. I humbly suggest 'knocker.'

htj wrote:Ah, so I assume the US male football team will do just as well then?

Interesting the vehemence to defend use of the word 'football' for the game in which you tend to hold the ball in your hands for the most part. Should've called it American Rugby, really. Then those wacky Yanks could call rugby something else. I humbly suggest 'knocker.'

I think "send the other team to the hospital" would work just as well.

Frazzled wrote:

Stormrider wrote:

LordofHats wrote:

Soladrin wrote:It's womens football, no one cares. XD

inoright? It's like women's basketball. No one gives a

All 37 of the fans at the WNBA All Star game are mad at you!

One can quickly tell who doesn't have daughters, or wives, or girlfriends who were athletic. Its kind of sad.

i agree, people at school can be pretty offensive about that kind of thing, i remember one time when me and my friends were talking about the world cup and the womens one was brought up, and he said that we were talking about the "real" world cup, although it was funny, it was funny in the "did you just say that " kind of way

and as for my take on basketball, just dont like it one bit, no matter who plays

Frazzled wrote:

htj wrote:Ah, so I assume the US male football team will do just as well then?

Interesting the vehemence to defend use of the word 'football' for the game in which you tend to hold the ball in your hands for the most part. Should've called it American Rugby, really. Then those wacky Yanks could call rugby something else. I humbly suggest 'knocker.'

I think "send the other team to the hospital" would work just as well.

Obviously you're thinking of Hockey, my good sir. It's much more violent the Football.

coolyo294 wrote:

Frazzled wrote:

htj wrote:Ah, so I assume the US male football team will do just as well then?

Interesting the vehemence to defend use of the word 'football' for the game in which you tend to hold the ball in your hands for the most part. Should've called it American Rugby, really. Then those wacky Yanks could call rugby something else. I humbly suggest 'knocker.'

I think "send the other team to the hospital" would work just as well.

Obviously you're thinking of Hockey, my good sir. It's much more violent the Football.

Same sport, different field.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
France just surrendered to the awesome might of SPAZ AMERICAS HURR!

Either Japan or Sweden is going down baby! (wait that could be misinterpreted...)

http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2011/07/13/us-advances-to-womens-world-cup-final/

Frazzled wrote:

Stormrider wrote:

LordofHats wrote:

Soladrin wrote:It's womens football, no one cares. XD

inoright? It's like women's basketball. No one gives a

All 37 of the fans at the WNBA All Star game are mad at you!

One can quickly tell who doesn't have daughters, or wives, or girlfriends who were athletic. Its kind of sad.

I'm joking Frazz! Although the WNBA has pathetic attendance and ratings, along with Women's NCAA BBall and MLS.

I always thought they should have the best female team in a given sport play the worst male team. Just to check what happens.