Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Enjoy

MOD: Please do not post copyrighted images or advertise links to them.

It is against the forum rules.

Nice pics, many thanks!

Thanks for posting that!

So...tune in next month for points values?

Maybe I'm wrong and you just didn't get pics of them, but let's be honest, it wouldn't be the first time GW made people buy two issues of WD in order to get a useable army list. At that point I'd rather spend the extra ten bucks and get a real Codex rather than having to flip through two magazines full of other articles to get the the worthwhile part.

...Is that all of the codex?

The army seems pretty powerful, but that will all hinge on how expensive they are. But army wide 6+ invulnerable save, awesome acts of faith, seraphims get to shoot dual pistols (two hand flamers with re-roll wound act of faith would be superdeath). It all seems to add up to a pretty strong showing, at least on paper.

Yes, the actual army list is in next month's WD.

Aren't magazine scans a big no-no?

N'Ferno wrote:Yes, the actual army list is in next month's WD.

Aren't magazine scans a big no-no?

When you own one?

Wouldn't think so.

Posting them on the internet for distribution however is quite different.

The retributer with heavy bolter is holding a multi melta. Sisters have heavy bolters that look suspiciously like multi meltas now.

SonicPara wrote:The army seems pretty powerful

... it is weaker than C:WH, which itself is weak.

The ONLY way this could be strong is if they're something around eight points or less per model.

You're acting like 6+ invulnerable saves really make that big of a difference on a T3 army which has power armor....

Why are there no pictures of the new models? Aren't they complete by now?

Also, having to wait for the points costs and wargear makes this... suckishly bad. :(

Popsicle wrote:Why are there no pictures of the new models? Aren't they complete by now?

Also, having to wait for the points costs and wargear makes this... suckishly bad. :(

Because we aren't gettign them with this half-assed codex.

I still find it hilarious the Sisters of Battle vehicles now have a laughable 6++. If Shield of Faith was 5++, the entire Daemons of Chaos and Dark Eldar (Flickerfields) community would be in an uproar. I wish the new Sisters retain their 5+ against psychic powers. Would have been better if it was improved to a 4+.

Melissia wrote:

SonicPara wrote:The army seems pretty powerful

... it is weaker than C:WH, which itself is weak.

The ONLY way this could be strong is if they're something around eight points or less per model.

You're acting like 6+ invulnerable saves really make that big of a difference on a T3 army which has power armor....

Both of you hush about the power of the codex, we don't know the point values yet and without the information the squabbling is meaningless.

Fanchy wrote:

N'Ferno wrote:Yes, the actual army list is in next month's WD.

Aren't magazine scans a big no-no?

When you own one?

Wouldn't think so.

MOD: Yes, I'm afraid they are.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
MOD: I would like to remind users that when you create an account on DakkaDakka.com you accept the requirement to obey various rules about the content you post.

One of them is to avoid posting copyright violating chunks of material, and links to such.

Thank you.