Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/04 21:24:28
Subject: Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Possessed Khorne Marine Covered in Spikes
|
So my local GW is doing an 800 point capaign running throughout the summer/ Battles occur every Saturday, and you can change your list for each week.
I want to employ the use of Drop Pods (3 or 4) for this weeks army, but do not own any and can't get even one for a month or so.
What I've done is taken my bucketload of sprue and constructed a basic frame of a Drop Pod-A pyramid, basically, the same shap, size and width as a Pod, 1 even has moving door things.
My question is this-Would this be allowed? I'm not quite sure if I'd be able to use them without a gamer/worker having a go at me, so I was wondering-
Is/Should this be allowed?
and
Would you allow it?
Thanks people!
|
Sternguard never die
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/04 21:26:03
Subject: Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Member of the Malleus
|
GW will most likely not allow it. (I would know  ) but thats a corporate policy.
me as a gamer in my own home, absolutely.
at your FLGS, I believe most people would as well.
|
[url]www.newaydesigns.com
[/url] |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/04 21:28:33
Subject: Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
A garden grove on Citadel Station
|
GW will 100% not allow it, most tournaments will not allow it, many people will not enjoy playing against it. I'm sure your friends would understand if you just wanted to use them to playtest before deciding if you actually wanted to buy them, but as a permanent/alternative solution to actually buying pods? I don't think so.
|
ph34r's Forgeworld Phobos blog, current WIP: Iron Warriors and Skaven Tau
+From Iron Cometh Strength+ +From Strength Cometh Will+ +From Will Cometh Faith+ +From Faith Cometh Honor+ +From Honor Cometh Iron+
The Polito form is dead, insect. Are you afraid? What is it you fear? The end of your trivial existence?
When the history of my glory is written, your species shall only be a footnote to my magnificence. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/04 21:29:33
Subject: Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Fully-charged Electropriest
|
Eh, I can foresee a few people getting anal over something like this.
It depends on who's running the store at the time, to be on the safe side I would write a list without the makeshift models and see what happens on the day when you turn up.
I probably wouldn't like it, but I wouldn't stop you from playing.
Then again, I don't have much experience regarding official/tournament play.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/08/04 21:30:52
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/04 21:39:06
Subject: Re:Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
!@##$ GW.
They want you to pay 50.00 for the same thing. Guess its some sort of status symble, or something, but this is the same compnay that had plans in WHITE FRIGGIN DWARF of the very same things.
Tanks, Bunkers, Tents, towers, wall sections...
You might try this instead.... then tell them to suck it.
http://santacruzwarhammer.blogspot.com/2007/11/low-buck-drop-pods-that-dont-suck.html
What happened to the "Hobby" of the hobby?
|
At Games Workshop, we believe that how you behave does matter. We believe this so strongly that we have written it down in the Games Workshop Book. There is a section in the book where we talk about the values we expect all staff to demonstrate in their working lives. These values are Lawyers, Guns and Money. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/04 21:41:55
Subject: Re:Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Sinewy Scourge
Grand ol US of A
|
I would have no problem since they are of approximate size...I played a game against a guy who used foam cut into the horizontal profile of a drop pod...he ran alot of them and wrote on them what they were equipped with so I guess I don't care that much and just enjoy playing.
|
d3m01iti0n wrote:
BT uses the Codex Astartes as toilet paper. They’re an Imp Fist successor, recruit from multiple planets, and are known to be the largest Chapter in the galaxy. They’re on a constant Crusade, keeping it real for the Emperor and not bumming around like the other guys. They hate psykers and can’t ally with them. They’re basically an entire chapter of Chaplains. CC lunatics. What every Space Marine should aspire to be, if not trapped in a Matt Ward nightmare.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/04 21:46:22
Subject: Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
DrownedRat117 wrote:I want to employ the use of Drop Pods (3 or 4) for this weeks army, but do not own any and can't get even one for a month or so...constructed a basic frame of a Drop Pod-A pyramid, basically, the same shap, size and width as a Pod
Playing proxy models IN a store that sells the things IN their event is pretty bad taste. Buy one from them.
My question is this-Would this be allowed?
No idea, probably ask the event holder?.
I'm not quite sure if I'd be able to use them without a gamer/worker having a go at me,
I'd have a go at you.
Is/Should this be allowed?
No.
Would you allow it?
Maybe in a friendly game, with a chiding, (I would lend you as many as you need). In an event, I wouldn't allow proxies, if I were running it, WYSIWYG.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2011/08/04 21:48:09
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/04 21:49:20
Subject: Re:Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Member of the Malleus
|
Akroma06 wrote:I would have no problem since they are of approximate size...I played a game against a guy who used foam cut into the horizontal profile of a drop pod...he ran alot of them and wrote on them what they were equipped with so I guess I don't care that much and just enjoy playing.
I mean, if I made one out of foam core and detailed it to be near identical, who would know? and if they did would you care?
I certainly would not.
GW IS GW, they are a company out to sell a product. you HAVE to keep that in mind. they make their rules to sell you things. its not evil, its business. its part of the cycle.
playing in a GW store, while free, you understand the policies in place, and you adhere to them. most LGS have rules imposed as well, some gaming centers even require memberships. no big deal.
|
[url]www.newaydesigns.com
[/url] |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/04 22:38:48
Subject: Re:Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Posts with Authority
South Carolina (upstate) USA
|
Grot 6 wrote:!@##$ GW.
this is the same compnay that had plans in WHITE FRIGGIN DWARF of the very same things.
What happened to the "Hobby" of the hobby?
From what i can gather your only allowed to scratch build things that dont have a model for them. Its pretty sad, but that seems to be the GW and GW fanboy opinion.
|
Whats my game?
Warmachine (Cygnar)
10/15mm mecha
Song of Blades & Heroes
Blackwater Gulch
X wing
Open to other games too
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/04 22:48:37
Subject: Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
That sort of bodging, for a game or two is fine. But as a permanent alternative, hell no! It's just cheap. At least make them out of card.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/04 22:59:58
Subject: Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Noble of the Alter Kindred
United Kingdom
|
Phone the store and ask would be my first move.
If you are intending on buying make it clear to them.
Back up by making an alternative list as someone mentioned.
Personally I wouldn't mind, and if it was for a game or two to test drive before committing to spend a lot of cash SHOULD be fine imho. But prolly isn't
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/04 23:11:27
Subject: Re:Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Grot 6 wrote:!@##$ GW.
They want you to pay 50.00 for the same thing. Guess its some sort of status symble, or something, but this is the same compnay that had plans in WHITE FRIGGIN DWARF of the very same things.
Tanks, Bunkers, Tents, towers, wall sections...
You might try this instead.... then tell them to suck it.
http://santacruzwarhammer.blogspot.com/2007/11/low-buck-drop-pods-that-dont-suck.html
What happened to the "Hobby" of the hobby?
Calm down petal. He's asking specifically about an instore session. If playing anywhere but you're own house, you kind of have to obey the rules. And not just in gaming. I swear like a trooper, yet when in polite company, I know that this is not acceptable, so I moderate my language. Not your place? Other persons rules. Your place? Do what you like and to hell with everyone else!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/04 23:22:27
Subject: Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
You Sunk My Battleship!
|
Why exactly would they have a problem with a scratch built model made from presumably GW materials?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/04 23:26:57
Subject: Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets
|
If you are attending any kind of tournament/event, GW sponsored or not, try and have the proper models. If everyone else can make the effort and expense to purchase the correct models, common gamer courtesy would say that you should at least do the same.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/04 23:46:11
Subject: Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Lord Commander in a Plush Chair
|
I think your makeshift models should look good. Make a decent effort and have something that looks the part. Because if it just looks like a load of bits of sprue stuck together then that's reason enough to have it refused for an event.
Perhaps you should put up a picture and show us what your substitute looks like?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/05 02:38:20
Subject: Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Are you one of my friends? Then yes to try something out.
Are you Little Billy Donkey that I don't know or care about? No, get that garbage out of here, buy the models or get a different hobby.
|
"Worglock is not wrong..." - Legoburner
Total Finecast Models purchased: 30.
Models with issues: 2
Models made good by Customer Service: 2
Finecast is... Fine... Get over it. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/05 04:07:13
Subject: Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Noble of the Alter Kindred
United Kingdom
|
Worglock wrote:Are you one of my friends? Then yes to try something out.
Are you Little Billy Donkey that I don't know or care about? No, get that garbage out of here, buy the models or get a different hobby.
It started so well Worglock. The first part is socially acceptable.
The second part crudely scratched together out of bits of old bile and unpleasantness ought not to be brought to the table.
But 50% good manners is an improvement.
Keep working at it and even though we may disagree with your opinion, we may actually come to respect it.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/05 04:15:19
Subject: Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Wraith
|
It depends.
If my opponent wants to try something out to determine its effectiveness, sure.
If he's still using his hodgepodge proxy six or seven weeks later, well, then I might take exception.
So once or twice might be OK, but you should eventually have a real model, whether you've bought it or made a dynamite scratch-build.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/08/05 04:16:10
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/05 04:30:38
Subject: Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
if its made out of spru, that it is 50% gw made therefor should technically be legal should it not?
|
keeping track since nov 08
w/l/d
Eldar 31/3/3
BA 5/0/2
Fighting Eldar is like trying to hold onto a fish... Except the fish is holding a brick... And every time you're not expecting it, it beats you with the brick. Enter the Eldar.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/05 05:16:23
Subject: Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
clidefr0g wrote:if its made out of spru, that it is 50% gw made therefor should technically be legal should it not?
no
|
"Worglock is not wrong..." - Legoburner
Total Finecast Models purchased: 30.
Models with issues: 2
Models made good by Customer Service: 2
Finecast is... Fine... Get over it. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/05 05:53:45
Subject: Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Wraith
|
As much as it pains me to agree with Worglock, he is correct.
While being made out of sprue might technically be following the letter of the law (IE, it contains no non-GW items), it definitely violates the spirit.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/05 06:28:46
Subject: Re:Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
At a store or event, absolutely not.
For friendlies, I'd tease you about it, and the teasing would increase the longer you used them for. Either scratch build some GOOD ones, or buy the GW ones.
|
"Did you ever notice how in the Bible, when ever God needed to punish someone, or make an example, or whenever God needed a killing, he sent an angel? Did you ever wonder what a creature like that must be like? A whole existence spent praising your God, but always with one wing dipped in blood. Would you ever really want to see an angel?" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/05 09:42:30
Subject: Re:Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Possessed Khorne Marine Covered in Spikes
|
I'm seeing all these posts about "Jusy buy 3 or 4 drop pods and stop whining", which is saying, basically, that I should pull around 80-90 pounds out of the air suddenly and buy them!
I do plan on buying them in time if I enjoy fielding them, hence my wanting to do this, and unfortunately I do not share everyones fantastic modelling skills, ideas, or supplies.
|
Sternguard never die
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/05 09:54:25
Subject: Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Noble of the Alter Kindred
United Kingdom
|
I would definitely proxy in a few games to see if I enjoyed using them before splashing out and building if I were you.
Ebay might be worth a visit.
Drop pods aren't too easy to stick together. If you decide to go for some ready built second hand could be a solution
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/05 09:56:19
Subject: Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
To try them, yes
Permanently, not anywhere except in a gaming club or in my home.
And I don't think that's a fanboy opinion, I think it's a general sense opinion.
The argument of "they're £20 each" is pretty silly in terms of a hobby where we all buy little plastic soldiers and fight each other. The fact is a drop pod allows you a tactical advantage in certain situations but in game they do very little other than sit there.
If you take issue with that, use the points on something more flexible and get more bang for your buck.
Not a direct shot at you OP, it just annoys me when people whine about the hobby mercilessly. Imagine if GW had an anything goes on our table approach? The hobby would be poorer for it.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/05 10:37:06
Subject: Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
[DCM]
Moustache-twirling Princeps
Gone-to-ground in the craters of Coventry
|
Drop pods are the one thing I'd be fine with if thrown together from bits.
It just sits on the table, is a fairly big intricate model, and is expensive for what it is.
But, that's me, and I prefer scratch-built vehicles to GW, if fluff and size/shape are close enough.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/05 13:00:24
Subject: Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Mutilatin' Mad Dok
|
I have zero problem someone has some of the scratch built drop pods from the above link, as it is almost the identical size representation and truly looks the part. I equate this to Ork Battlewagon. YES there is a kit, however we have all seen those awe inspiring Battlewagons that some Ork players rock out with. The SM drop pod is an example where the SM player can get creative and it will not overtly affect how the game turns out.
However, using something that's pyramid shaped? Not at a tournment. But if your at my house / basement go for it. Reasoning is true line of sight is affected greatly by a model that is not similar stature to the original model. Many TO's will see this well ahead of time and veto things. I dislike when people show up with Gator bottle drop pods, or paint cans at a tournment. It bother me immensely as my army is fully painted and represents what it is, I don't have options to skimp, why should you?
A scratch built model that is almost similar structure shows a few things: fore thought, know how, effort, and respect. That i'm ok with. But paint cans, models which are not even close to the original, i'm sorry, not a fan. Again 1 off game / gaming at a buddies, no problem. Tournment = problem.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/08/05 13:01:39
Tournment Record
2013: Khador (40-9-0)
============
DQ:70+S++++G+M+B+I+Pw40k95-D++A+++/aWD100R+++T(M)DM+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/05 13:12:05
Subject: Re:Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Last Remaining Whole C'Tan
|
If you were one of my RL friends and wanted to test them out, I wouldn't care. I'm more happy to actually get a game.
Otherwise, I'd have to see it. I don't mind reasonable proxies, but this might be on the low end of reasonable, depending - I don't want to fight soda-can carnifexes, nickel marines, or shoebox monoliths.
Skinnereal had a good point about more leeway for drop pods then maybe other models
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2011/08/05 13:14:32
lord_blackfang wrote:Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.
Flinty wrote:The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/05 13:27:53
Subject: Re:Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Major
|
In my gaming group,I have used cottage cheese containers for drop pods.Later i added some foam core not to shabby for a few time uses.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/05 13:29:06
Subject: Would you allow "makeshift" models such as this?
|
 |
Brigadier General
|
I call for a picture of this sprue-pod.
As everyone else says, it won't fly with GW. As for me, I'm all about "rule of cool". If it looks cool, I'll be happy to play with it. If it doesn't, I'll probably play anyway, but there may be hints dropped on how to make it cooler or replace it.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|