Switch Theme:

Tactical differences and implications between 40mm bases and 25mm bases.  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Numberless Necron Warrior




I hear that there is a good chance that we are going to get Necrons back, and I love my Necrons (mainly the fluff and feel but not the rules as much.) However one of the rumors is that the Immortals will have 40mm bases instead of the current 25mm. All talk of rumors aside, what are the implications of such a thing.

I am inclined to believe that the larger bases will make close combat harder in large groups. It also seems that disembarking would also be a bit harder in large groups. I only say this because of my Terminator experiences coming out of a land raider. However, I can’t think of any other main difference. Perhaps I am missing something.

Also… A hypothetical. Let’s pretend that they do change the base size of a unit from 25mm to 40mm in a new codex. Should I rebase all of my current (and older) models to the new base size or should I just use what I got since the old model came with the smaller base.

Life Sucks Press On.
In order of collection:
Space Marines
Necrons
Renegade Guardsmen
Dark Eldar 
   
Made in ph
Stealthy Space Wolves Scout





40 mm bases mean that Immortals will be tougher to hide or keep in area terrain, as for your 2nd point regarding assault, it is a myth.

Lastly, you have to resize your bases to the bigger ones because of the advantage mentioned above.

There are 2 kinds of Dakka members: People who just think the game and people who actually play the game. Which one are you? 
   
Made in ca
Ork-Hunting Inquisitorial Xenokiller





Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

I just checked the rulebook, and what it says for base size is this;
"Citadel miniatures are normally supplied with a plastic base. If so, they must be glued onto their bases before they can be used in the game.
Some players like to mount their models on impressive scenic bases.As mounting your models on different sized bases might affect the way they interact with the rules, make sure before the fame that your opponent dos not mind this."

As there is no specific rule regarding upgrading to current bases, I would suggest you make sure the base size is okay with your opponent. I know people who still use the 3rd edition Heavy Weapons teams for IG, and have seen the old Predator tanks on the gaming table. I don't think it would be a problem with most gamers.

40k 7th Edition Record
11 Games played
5 Games Won 
   
Made in gb
Proud Phantom Titan







Thaanos wrote:I just checked the rulebook, and what it says for base size is this;
"Citadel miniatures are normally supplied with a plastic base. If so, they must be glued onto their bases before they can be used in the game.
Some players like to mount their models on impressive scenic bases.As mounting your models on different sized bases might affect the way they interact with the rules, make sure before the fame that your opponent dos not mind this."

As there is no specific rule regarding upgrading to current bases, I would suggest you make sure the base size is okay with your opponent. I know people who still use the 3rd edition Heavy Weapons teams for IG, and have seen the old Predator tanks on the gaming table. I don't think it would be a problem with most gamers.
... while true It depends it if the rest of the model stays the same. Grotesques and battle wagons for example have changed a lot. While they can be used for other things I would become TFG if i used what they were.


   
Made in dk
Stormin' Stompa





Yuber wrote:
Lastly, you have to resize your bases to the bigger ones because of the advantage mentioned above.


Do you have a rules-quote for that?

-------------------------------------------------------
"He died because he had no honor. He had no honor and the Emperor was watching."

18.000 3.500 8.200 3.300 2.400 3.100 5.500 2.500 3.200 3.000


 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





Yuber wrote:
Lastly, you have to resize your bases to the bigger ones because of the advantage mentioned above.

That is actually against the rules. The rules require you to put models on the bases they came with. The only modifications allowed being for "scenic" bases.

"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."

This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.


Freelance Ontologist

When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. 
   
Made in us
Mekboy on Kustom Deth Kopta






yea, use your origional base. if you don't use the included base you technically are breaking the rules. there are teminators out there that came with the origional smaller base. if you have these origional models they are legal for tourney play.

keep the base it came with imo if anybody complains remind them it came with that base and you'd be breaking the rules if you did rebase

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/09/01 14:34:57


10000 points 7000
6000
5000
5000
2000
 
   
Made in us
Huge Hierodule





Louisiana

I have ten metal Immortals. If the new models (if we even get new models, i'm praying that we do) come on 40mm bases (which again might not be true) I will probably buy a 1" drill bit from lowes, drill the centers of some 40mm bases and drop my immortals i have already painted/based into the larger slots. I'm not required to do so but it will give my army a more uniform look and appeal which i desire.

Anybody telling you that you MUST rebase your old models is full of baloney. I know people who played rogue trader and still have 25mm terminators. You want to know how it has changed our games? Not one bit.

Been out of the game for awhile, trying to find time to get back into it. 
   
Made in us
Blood Angel Terminator with Lightning Claws




Montgomery, AL

Tri wrote:
Thaanos wrote:I just checked the rulebook, and what it says for base size is this;
"Citadel miniatures are normally supplied with a plastic base. If so, they must be glued onto their bases before they can be used in the game.
Some players like to mount their models on impressive scenic bases.As mounting your models on different sized bases might affect the way they interact with the rules, make sure before the fame that your opponent dos not mind this."

As there is no specific rule regarding upgrading to current bases, I would suggest you make sure the base size is okay with your opponent. I know people who still use the 3rd edition Heavy Weapons teams for IG, and have seen the old Predator tanks on the gaming table. I don't think it would be a problem with most gamers.
... while true It depends it if the rest of the model stays the same. Grotesques and battle wagons for example have changed a lot. While they can be used for other things I would become TFG if i used what they were.




You are not TFG just because you are using older models. You are not required to go out and repurchase your entire army everything GW does a line change.

On Dakka he was Eldanar. In our area, he was Lee. R.I.P., Lee Guthrie.  
   
Made in gb
Proud Phantom Titan







jbunny wrote: You are not TFG just because you are using older models. You are not required to go out and repurchase your entire army everything GW does a line change.
... In the examples i've show you are. The old models just do not link with the new rules. If you have old Ork trukks or the tiny Eldar Avatar, you really need to get the new models and use the old ones for something else (for example a buggy and a farseer). You may, just may, have a good gaming group that will let you proxy these models as the new ones but at a tournament, you'd not stand a chance.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/09/01 16:40:45


 
   
Made in us
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets






Connecticut

In addition to making it harder to keep the squad in cover, larger bases have an impact vs template weapons.

A flamer template will not hit as many models with larger bases. If your models are clumped, then blast templates will not hit as many models.

They will also have a larger footprint on the table. This means that if you spam 30 of the models, then its possible you will not have enough space for all the models due to terrain before they start blocking their own ability to fire.

I play with a marine bike army, and the larger bases have often been a problem for me.
   
Made in us
Bloodthirsty Chaos Knight





Washington USA

Tri wrote:
jbunny wrote: You are not TFG just because you are using older models. You are not required to go out and repurchase your entire army everything GW does a line change.
... In the examples i've show you are. The old models just do not link with the new rules. If you have old Ork trukks or the tiny Eldar Avatar, you really need to get the new models and use the old ones for something else (for example a buggy and a farseer). You may, just may, have a good gaming group that will let you proxy these models as the new ones but at a tournament, you'd not stand a chance.


Can you cite any rules for this please?

“Yesss! Just as planned!”
–Spoken by Xi’aquan, Lord of Change, in its death throes  
   
Made in ca
Ork-Hunting Inquisitorial Xenokiller





Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Tri wrote:
jbunny wrote: You are not TFG just because you are using older models. You are not required to go out and repurchase your entire army everything GW does a line change.
... In the examples i've show you are. The old models just do not link with the new rules. If you have old Ork trukks or the tiny Eldar Avatar, you really need to get the new models and use the old ones for something else (for example a buggy and a farseer). You may, just may, have a good gaming group that will let you proxy these models as the new ones but at a tournament, you'd not stand a chance.

I'd say you're TFG for not letting people use official GW models

40k 7th Edition Record
11 Games played
5 Games Won 
   
Made in us
Mekboy on Kustom Deth Kopta






Tri wrote:
jbunny wrote: You are not TFG just because you are using older models. You are not required to go out and repurchase your entire army everything GW does a line change.
... In the examples i've show you are. The old models just do not link with the new rules. If you have old Ork trukks or the tiny Eldar Avatar, you really need to get the new models and use the old ones for something else (for example a buggy and a farseer). You may, just may, have a good gaming group that will let you proxy these models as the new ones but at a tournament, you'd not stand a chance.


an ork player a few weeks ago used 2 old school battle wagons in an ard boys. same event had a player using old metla termies on the smaller bases... both had no problems

official gw models are always ok in all official tournies, and if somebody isn't lettig them in a private event that's thier choice but it'd be a dick move

10000 points 7000
6000
5000
5000
2000
 
   
Made in ph
Stealthy Space Wolves Scout





Steelmage99 wrote:
Yuber wrote:
Lastly, you have to resize your bases to the bigger ones because of the advantage mentioned above.


Do you have a rules-quote for that?


Nope, there is no rule in the rulebook that says so whatsoever. But hey if you want to be RAW just to have an advantage against other players, and they dont have a problem with it, go to town.

And if you really think it doesn't have any difference in the game, I feel sad for you.

There are 2 kinds of Dakka members: People who just think the game and people who actually play the game. Which one are you? 
   
Made in us
Huge Hierodule





Louisiana

Yuber wrote:
Steelmage99 wrote:
Yuber wrote:
Lastly, you have to resize your bases to the bigger ones because of the advantage mentioned above.


Do you have a rules-quote for that?


Nope, there is no rule in the rulebook that says so whatsoever. But hey if you want to be RAW just to have an advantage against other players, and they dont have a problem with it, go to town.

And if you really think it doesn't have any difference in the game, I feel sad for you.


The differences it has in game only matter to people who bleed RAW in the first place and can't play the game to have a fun, narrative time. I feel sad for them, actually.

Been out of the game for awhile, trying to find time to get back into it. 
   
Made in gb
Proud Phantom Titan







G00fySmiley wrote:
Tri wrote:
jbunny wrote: You are not TFG just because you are using older models. You are not required to go out and repurchase your entire army everything GW does a line change.
... In the examples i've show you are. The old models just do not link with the new rules. If you have old Ork trukks or the tiny Eldar Avatar, you really need to get the new models and use the old ones for something else (for example a buggy and a farseer). You may, just may, have a good gaming group that will let you proxy these models as the new ones but at a tournament, you'd not stand a chance.


an ork player a few weeks ago used 2 old school battle wagons in an ard boys. same event had a player using old metla termies on the smaller bases... both had no problems

official gw models are always ok in all official tournies, and if somebody isn't lettig them in a private event that's thier choice but it'd be a dick move
It's modelling for an advantage ... no different then a player that makes a crawling wraithlord. The game is permissive If you agree to it then any things fine but I see no reason you can't easily rebase or use models for a role that they match more.

If you see any old dark eldar grotesque I'm sure you'll be complaining about the LOS issues they have.
   
Made in us
Lord of the Fleet





Texas

Except the fact that grotesques is a weird example since it is a HUGE change. Its like as if terminators looked like imperial guard back then and then suddenly turned into what they are today. Most updates arent like that

 
   
Made in gb
Proud Phantom Titan







kenshin620 wrote:Except the fact that grotesques is a weird example since it is a HUGE change. Its like as if terminators looked like imperial guard back then and then suddenly turned into what they are today. Most updates arent like that
Note that we don't know that they'll stay the same and all my other examples are also massive changes. (also old terminator are smaller ... if only very slightly)
Spoiler:
ignore the conversion on the left ...

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2011/09/02 13:17:58


 
   
Made in nz
Regular Dakkanaut






The most immediate difference (to me as an ork player) is that you can disembark and effectively be 15mm closer to the enemy for shooting and assaults.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: