Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

ToI wrote:

The Green Git wrote:Isn't there a specific clause that states you must end each model's movement in unit coherency with one of the models that has already moved?

Pretty much prevents most of the shenanigans being proposed...

actually no it doesn't, that clause is the very thing allowing you to multichargewith strung out models. Because you use the models that can't engage to string coherency between two units. They get their 6" move and in the process allow you to reach multiple units while still unable to engage on their own.

Yes it does. The very first bullet point on page 34 says that each model moved (after the first) must end it's move in coherency with another model that has already moved. Not units, models. I think you're answering a different question then you quoted.

This particular multi-assault looks pretty easy to pull off.

The main things to remember that makes it easy is this: You don't have to move into base to base with a model in range that is in a unit you have not yet assaulted...in fact you are not allowed to get into base-to-base with a unit you're not assaulting (yet).

If you declare against the top rhino, even though one of the models moved after the first is within 6" of the 2nd rhino, and moving into base-to-base with it would break coheriency, you don't have to move into base to base with the 2nd rhino until you want to. So in the previous illustrations, the yellow line is quite valid.