| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2011/10/15 04:15:52
Subject: Walker vs Walker
|
|
Been Around the Block
|
Scenario:
3 Killa Kans moved 6 inches during movement, fired then assaulted a land raider. Turn end. Next turn the land raider moved away. Defiler moves withing 1", fires and renders one immobilized. Assault phase is where it gets fuzzy. According to vehicle rules, you have to roll a 4 to hit something that moved at combat speed. Would 4's have to be rolled even though a kan is immobilized in the assault? Would the kans roll a 4 to counter attack the defilers assault?
|
|
|
 |
|
2011/10/15 04:22:54
Subject: Re:Walker vs Walker
|
|
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
look up the Walker section, it explains how they fight.
Walkers fight in the same way as infantry. Walker fighting Walker will be a comparison of WS and they will be locked in combat till one side is destroyed(as neither will ever take Ld tests)
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
|
|
|
2011/10/15 04:23:22
Subject: Walker vs Walker
|
|
Captain of the Forlorn Hope
|
If the Kans were all one unit then the Immobilized one would become wrecked instead, since they are a squadron.
However, for vehicles with a Weapon Skill you always compare Weapon Skills instead of going off of the speed the vehicle moved.
|
"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.
I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!
We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
|
|
|
|
|
2011/10/15 04:24:53
Subject: Walker vs Walker
|
|
Lord Commander in a Plush Chair
|
First question: brb page 63 has the answers for normal vehicles getting assaulted; note how the auto-hit is on a vehicle that "is" immobilized.
However you should really read Page 73; which is walkers and assaults; Speed does not matter for walkers, only WS
|
This is my Rulebook. There are many Like it, but this one is mine. Without me, my rulebook is useless. Without my rulebook, I am useless.
Stop looking for buzz words and start reading the whole sentences.
|
|
|
|
|
2011/10/17 03:47:10
Subject: Walker vs Walker
|
|
Flashy Flashgitz
|
DeathReaper wrote:If the Kans were all one unit then the Immobilized one would become wrecked instead, since they are a squadron.
However, for vehicles with a Weapon Skill you always compare Weapon Skills instead of going off of the speed the vehicle moved.
+1
You need to look up both walker rules and squadrons of walkers. As a side note, once the unit of Kans gets down to 1 this wouldn't be the case anymore and don't forget grenades need 6's to hit walkers. Gl
|
7 Armies 30,000+
 ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
