Poll |
 |
|
 |
Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/26 19:52:21
Subject: Daleks or Necrons?
|
 |
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
So who would win in a war? Daleks or Crons?
Remember that both are packing some pretty nasty tech, like reality warping stuff, time manipulation, control of other dimensions, etc.
Modern Daleks, 9th doctor and onwards that is.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/10/26 19:58:41
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/26 19:55:38
Subject: Daleks or Necrons?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
Seattle
|
Are these modern Daleks or 1970s Daleks?
|
It is best to be a pessimist. You are usually right and, when you're wrong, you're pleasantly surprised. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/26 19:57:59
Subject: Daleks or Necrons?
|
 |
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
Psienesis wrote:Are these modern Daleks or 1970s Daleks?
Ah good question...lets say modern Daleks, cause I don't know the old ones that well.
|
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/26 20:18:16
Subject: Daleks or Necrons?
|
 |
Infiltrating Hawwa'
Through the looking glass
|
I've never found the Daleks particularly fearsome. Their gunstick, a standard weapon, appearantly effects biological life forms but doesn't really ahrm the skeleton too much. Necrons are made of living metal, and their standard weapon are magnetically based weapons that break down the target into its component molecules layer by layer and attract the molecules back to the gun.
So yeah, I fear the necrons (pre touch of ward) more than some rolling trashcans.
|
“Sometimes I can hear my bones straining under the weight of all the lives I'm not living.”
― Jonathan Safran Foer |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/26 20:22:59
Subject: Daleks or Necrons?
|
 |
Sinewy Scourge
Murfreesboro, TN
|
Daleks beat the crap out of the Cybermen so I'm guessing Daleks, since the necrons have gotten rid of the C'tan now apperently. To bad to, their necrodermis would probably cut through dalek armor.
And this feels like my nerdest post ever for some reason...
|
"I'm not much for prejudice, I prefer to judge people by whats inside, and how much fun it is to get to those insides." - Unknown Haemonculi |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/26 20:23:39
Subject: Daleks or Necrons?
|
 |
Screaming Shining Spear
Pittsburgh, PA
|
Necroshea wrote:I've never found the Daleks particularly fearsome. Their gunstick, a standard weapon, appearantly effects biological life forms but doesn't really ahrm the skeleton too much. Necrons are made of living metal, and their standard weapon are magnetically based weapons that break down the target into its component molecules layer by layer and attract the molecules back to the gun.
So yeah, I fear the necrons (pre touch of ward) more than some rolling trashcans.
True, Dalek guns never really seem to affect metal more than leaving a scorch mark, I don't think the Necrons will mind a little scuffing.
|
Eldar shenanigans are the best shenanigans!
DQ:90S++G+M--B+IPw40k09#+D++A++/areWD-R++T(T)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/26 20:24:23
Subject: Daleks or Necrons?
|
 |
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
gardeth wrote:Daleks beat the crap out of the Cybermen so I'm guessing Daleks, since the necrons have gotten rid of the C'tan now apperently. To bad to, their necrodermis would probably cut through dalek armor.
And this feels like my nerdest post ever for some reason...
The C'tan are not gone. They now serve the necrons.
And yes, this is nerdy...but then again, this a Wargaming forum, so what did you expect?
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2011/10/26 20:40:47
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/26 20:25:06
Subject: Daleks or Necrons?
|
 |
Terrifying Doombull
|
I dread to say this, but Necrons would win.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/26 20:39:00
Subject: Daleks or Necrons?
|
 |
Abhorrent Grotesque Aberration
|
It wouldn't even be close. 'Crons.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/10/26 20:39:10
------------------
"Why me?" Gideon begged, falling to his knees.
"Why not?" - Asdrubael Vect |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/26 20:55:42
Subject: Daleks or Necrons?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
Seattle
|
Well, hmm, probably Necrons, but, I dunno, the Cybermen issue does bring up a good point...
ANNIHILATE! EXTERMINATE! DESTROY!
|
It is best to be a pessimist. You are usually right and, when you're wrong, you're pleasantly surprised. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/26 20:58:50
Subject: Re:Daleks or Necrons?
|
 |
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
Don't the Daleks have some pretty nasty stuff though? Like time travel and the ability to steal planets?
|
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/26 22:42:54
Subject: Daleks or Necrons?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
Seattle
|
Unfortunately for the Necrons, the Daleks are all equipped with a force-field that deflects both physical attacks as well as energy weapons, thus rendering their gauss cannons fairly ineffective. The single eye-stalk is still the Dalek's weakest point, however. Blinding this apparatus is an almost sure-fire way to negate a threatening Dalek.
Their energy weapons are believed to be plasmatic in function, and are capable of firing through water. It also bears some electrical effects, possibly delivering EMP pulses to mechanoid targets, such as Cybermen and other Daleks.
They can fly, both as hoverers on planets and through space. While individual Daleks cannot manipulate time, their society is extremely advanced, and is capable of producing machines and devices which can perform such feats, as well as many other things.
Daleks, contrary to popular belief, are not mechanoid or cybernetic. They are a small, crustaceanic/encephalopodic race who don these polycarbide armored suits to travel around in.
(gleaned from Wikipedia)
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/10/26 22:43:09
It is best to be a pessimist. You are usually right and, when you're wrong, you're pleasantly surprised. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/10/26 22:58:59
Subject: Daleks or Necrons?
|
 |
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer
Somewhere in south-central England.
|
Daleks.
They are just as technologically capable but they don't keep fighting each other all the time like Necrons do.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|