Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

So I've converted mine to look like this
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dcmvc5a-Luk/S7Vh1-VHmDI/AAAAAAAAA-c/lddKxI_MqLY/s1600/setback_chimera.jpg
Which hatch should I use? There's a smaller one at the back, just stick with that? Then there shouldn't be too much of an issue? Despite the hatch is a shade smaller?

Also, this is another guys idea, blog, etc etc. and by the by its really easy to follow, and really good. I mean, I'm a beginner modeller and I could handle it. Anyway yeah, on the rules question? whats the opinion?

Very nice. Yeah,personally i would still use the back hatch as the fire point to keep it standard with 'regular' Chimeras.

The smaller hatch, and the turret directly in front of it, are both detrimental to their ability in game - so I doubt anyone would complain too much about it.

Cheers

First, the chim looks great. The Tallarns I see in the back look great.

But, with your obvious skill at painting and converting....why keep with the cadian style tank commander? Jazz him up with some greenstuff turban goodyness!!!!!

Those aren't his chimeras, as he said they're from someone else's blog -.-

Ha yeah, as old mate said, its another persons

Those are Sandwyrm's Tallarns, if anyone's interested:

http://theback40k.blogspot.com/search/label/Imperial%20Guard

thats not a demolisher