| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/11 15:01:56
Subject: Entropic Strike
|
 |
Sure Space Wolves Land Raider Pilot
|
Hi All
Just having a quick chat with a Necron fighting chum and we were discussing the Entropic Strike rule. The rule states "Any model that suffers one or more wounds .... has it's armour save reduced to - for the whole game".
Would this affect the inv save also? We were wondering if the model would lose it's armour related inv save such as the 5+ termi inv save!
Any thoughts?
Cheers
Andy
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/11 15:04:23
Subject: Entropic Strike
|
 |
Stealthy Grot Snipa
|
It says armour not Invunerable.
It's just really twisting word to try and pull one over your opponent It's not how It was intended as you probably know.
So no.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/11 15:13:47
Subject: Entropic Strike
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Armour saves are not invulnerable saves. So, no.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/11 16:44:55
Subject: Entropic Strike
|
 |
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
Nope. Unless it says invulnerable saves are reduced (it doesn't) then only the armor saves are affected.
|
Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/11 18:47:26
Subject: Entropic Strike
|
 |
Lord Commander in a Plush Chair
|
Armor Saves are a specific kind of save; and specified as the save lost.
Thankfully Armor itself is not lost; so a GK Paladin would not lose his relentless, nor would he lose the invulnerable save, both granted by the armor. He also still cannot SA; and will still not fit into a rhino or a razorback.
|
This is my Rulebook. There are many Like it, but this one is mine. Without me, my rulebook is useless. Without my rulebook, I am useless.
Stop looking for buzz words and start reading the whole sentences.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|