Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/15 20:38:09
Subject: Small Sentinel Changes
|
 |
Stalwart Veteran Guard Sergeant
|
I was thinking that Sentinels aren't given full access to the Imperial Guard armory for inexplicable reasons I think that should be fixed. I realize that the multi-lazor is probably better than some of the other weapons choices given to other vechs, but i don't see any reason why shouldn't be able to take them if you want.
First off, allow sentinels to take a Heavy bolter instead of a multilasor.
Secondly why not allow sentnels to take a twin linked heavy stubber or 2 or stormbolters.
Why not allow for "pintle" mounted weapons. On open top you could mount it right in front of the driver and on armored you could mount it on the bottom in between the legs.
Of course what iw ould most like to see is the ablity to take a second weapon on the other sid eof sent instead of being relegated to just one weapon.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/16 15:02:38
Subject: Small Sentinel Changes
|
 |
Growlin' Guntrukk Driver with Killacannon
Denmark
|
I'm sorry to say it, but not a lot of people would take these options even if they were available in the codex anyway. They are very fluffy though, and I wouldn't mind an opponent using such sentinels against me.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/16 15:45:50
Subject: Small Sentinel Changes
|
 |
Rogue Daemonhunter fueled by Chaos
|
I've often felt that it's odd that hte sentinel is the only walker to only have one weapon. Every other walker has either two ranged weapons, or at least two ranged weapons and a DCCW.
They've tried to cost the sentinel to make up for it, and unlike all other walkers they are Fast Attack, not heavies (or elites).
The HB option, is IIRC, a FW rule, along with the multi-melta.
Personally, i think that sentinels should be able to buy a pintle mounted heavy stubber, flamer, or grenade launcher for 5pts. But they just recut the sprure and that will simply never happen.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/16 17:31:23
Subject: Small Sentinel Changes
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Polonius wrote:I've often felt that it's odd that hte sentinel is the only walker to only have one weapon. Every other walker has either two ranged weapons, or at least two ranged weapons and a DCCW.
They got a new buddy in the Triarch Stalker which only has 1 gun.
|
"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."
This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.
Freelance Ontologist
When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/16 22:16:56
Subject: Small Sentinel Changes
|
 |
Stalwart Veteran Guard Sergeant
|
meh i would rather have the ability to put a punisher on a sentinel
|
3k+ IG
Chimeras > rhinos (course then again piling a regular squad out of a chimera usually creates a scene similar to Omaha beach during D-Day) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/16 22:23:32
Subject: Small Sentinel Changes
|
 |
Pyromaniac Hellhound Pilot
Australia
|
I like the sound of two guns on a sentinel too, but how would he fire both and drive it at the same time. Unless he's got three arms? Mutant! Blam!
I'll take the Punisher cannon though, that would look so cool!
|
4th company
The Screaming Beagles of Helicia V
Hive Fleet Jumanji
I'll die before I surrender Tim! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/16 22:41:19
Subject: Small Sentinel Changes
|
 |
Manhunter
|
A bit too big though, methinks.
|
Lokas wrote:...Enemy of my enemy is kind of a dick, so let's kill him too.
"Without judgement there is no obstacle to action." ~ Kommander Oleg Strakhov
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/16 22:44:56
Subject: Small Sentinel Changes
|
 |
Storm Trooper with Maglight
EARTH- America- Rochester MI
|
Well even though its a fast vehical, we could Over Price certin things
Punisher cannon +50 just because it belongs on tanks, andonly on heavy sentinals
I agree all weapons should be twin linked
'Pintle Mounted Gl/heavy Flamer/STubber/ +15pts
DCCW or equivilant +15 pts
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/17 01:55:02
Subject: Small Sentinel Changes
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
|
Haha its a little funny to see how often old topics that die roll back around again... let see, my humble opnion on the sentinal using previous ideas from several threads back: OVERALL: -heavy flamer is free for all sentinals -heavy bolter 5pts -multimelta 15pts -scout sentianl may also purchase a sentinal CCW at 15pts in addtion to there regular armament Armoured sentinal: The armoured sentinal may be upgraded to carry a secondary co-axel weapon at 5pts consisting of: free - storm bolter or heavy stubber 5pts - GL 5pts - Flamwer 10pts - meltagun 15pts - plasmagun 10pts - sentinal CCW (+2 str +1 atk) 25pts - sentinal power claw (counts as a DCW) 10pts - hunter killer missle The armoured sentinal may still puchase another hunter killer missle for 10pts in addition to the secondary weapons slot. Extra things that also might fall under consideration: 20pts- Scout sentinal power pack: provides extra boost of speed for the sentinal driver to scout and avoid engagements. Grants +2" to movement while running on a 4+ 20pts: your idea for the sentinal punisher cannon, mounted exclusively on armoured sentinals due to weight and ammo needs.
|
This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2011/11/17 01:59:33
"Give me my men and let me show you arses how you assult Orks."-Col. Veros
win-loss ratio:
24-17-6
i play:
orkursk 82nd crimson guard |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/17 02:00:53
Subject: Small Sentinel Changes
|
 |
Boom! Leman Russ Commander
|
Majsharan wrote:I was thinking that Sentinels aren't given full access to the Imperial Guard armory for inexplicable reasons I think that should be fixed. I realize that the multi-lazor is probably better than some of the other weapons choices given to other vechs, but i don't see any reason why shouldn't be able to take them if you want.
First off, allow sentinels to take a Heavy bolter instead of a multilasor.
Secondly why not allow sentnels to take a twin linked heavy stubber or 2 or stormbolters.
Why not allow for "pintle" mounted weapons. On open top you could mount it right in front of the driver and on armored you could mount it on the bottom in between the legs.
Of course what iw ould most like to see is the ablity to take a second weapon on the other sid eof sent instead of being relegated to just one weapon.
First and foremost.
Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation.
Or, Laser is not Lazor. That is incredibly annoying.
Why would you want a heavy bolter? Laserftw.
Propose to me how you plan to fit two stormbolters on a sentinel and make it look cool, and I will make it for you.
Stubbers aren't great.
I don't care about pintle mounted weapons, and I doubt any other people do. They're nice extras which shouldn't be found on a one-man piloted walker.
Noone else would really go for these options. I honestly can't imagine sentinels being important in a guard army, unless you're going for a theme [in which case all these points are void. ]
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/17 02:16:50
Subject: Small Sentinel Changes
|
 |
Storm Trooper with Maglight
EARTH- America- Rochester MI
|
In small games (500-750) I generaly use 2 sentinals w Plamsa cannons, a couple vet squads, a chimera, and a Lord Commisar. Works extramly well, unless im against av 13, then its challenging av14 I cant even penetrate, or glance.
In apoc games, I take sentinals because theyre less than infantry spam, and easier to find in my box.
Sentinals can be extramly effective, if used correctly, and small pt game is lucky to have a sentinal, and due to their low cost, you can field 2 decent sentinals, over 1 jacked up dreadnought. give or take 15pts.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/11/17 16:11:04
Subject: Small Sentinel Changes
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
|
I will have to go with impguard with this one, sentinals do have a purpose, especially scout sentinals. The ability to outflank a bunch of cheap thin armoured guns on the backfeild means that you can be putting out alot of side armour shots for a small investment. The only reason you dont see them and anything other fast attack choice more often is because of the valk's and the vendettas being under-priced. The armoured sentinal on the other hand falls in disuse because the chimera fills its niche and offers other uses on top of that.
|
"Give me my men and let me show you arses how you assult Orks."-Col. Veros
win-loss ratio:
24-17-6
i play:
orkursk 82nd crimson guard |
|
 |
 |
|