Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I play grey knights ...nuff said
Anyway i was playing a game with my friend and he was takeing shots against my 5 man paladin unit. Now everyone but 2 units were different. the unit in the squad was , the justicar, a unit with a hammer, a unit with a sword , and 2 units with halberds. the squad took a total of 4 wounds with armor saves allowd . one paladin with a halberd has 1 wound remaining with everyone else being at full strength before wounds are allocated. i attempted to allocate a 1 wound to the 2 guys with halberds, 1 wound to the guy with a hammer , 1 wound to the guy with a sword and the justicar. he claims that if i want to put a wound on the 2 units that are the same i have to allocate 2 becase i need to " allocate to kill " . Im not wiz kid with the wound allocation system but i think what i was trying to do was fine. idk what do you guys think/know?

Allocating 1 wound to the halberd section of the unit is fine, but that 1 wound, if the save is failed, nukes the wounded paladin.

Thats what i had though thanks im going to need to inform him of his mistake