Switch Theme:

Is it ok to use an assault to restore coherency?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Wicked Canoptek Wraith






That is about it. Have at it Dakka.

Ya, I play Crons, what about it?
Also, they are just shiny space zombies with guns.

6700 
   
Made in us
Sneaky Lictor





You are forced to move your models in the Movement phase so as to try to end your phase in Coherency.

You are also forced to Run! your models in the Shooting phase so as to end that phase in Coherency.

To my knowledge there are no such restrictions placed on the unit in the Assault phase. Nor do I believe you are prohibited from assaulting (though I could be wrong on that one). I think you're good to go on that one.

-Yad
   
Made in ca
Trustworthy Shas'vre




Short answer, yes, you can use your assault move to regain coherency.

In fact it is required that you restore coherency if it is possible during this move, to the extent that it is better for the model to end up in coherency with it's unit than it is for it to end up fighting with the opposing unit.

Tau and Space Wolves since 5th Edition. 
   
Made in us
5th God of Chaos! (Ho-hum)





Curb stomping in the Eye of Terror!

If I understand the question... if you're still out of coherency even after running, then you may assault if it brings your unit into coherency as long as the squad has FLEET. Otherwise, in your next movement phase, you're required to move as much as possible into coherency.

However, I don't think I've ever had this case happen to me before... o.O

Live Ork, Be Ork. or D'Ork!


 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut






To expand on Jefffar's point, so long as you follow the assault rules, which have stricter coherency rules than normal movement, coherency does say that you must regain coherecy at your earliest opportunity.

Thus, I would argue that if assault would bring you back into coherency, you MUST assault, as said assault movement would be the earliest opportunity to restore coherency. Obviously, if you are unable to fulfil all the assault movement requirements then you cant assault.
   
Made in us
Boosting Black Templar Biker




California

Assaulting (to paraphrase the rules) require that each model in the unit charging:
1) Get into base to base with an enemy (we will ignore the closest to closest and so on for this)
2) If you cannot get into base contact, get within 2" of someone who is in base contact who has already moved
3) If you can't even make within 2" of someone who is in base contact you must end up within coherency of models which have already moved

This leaves me with the impression that even though the coherency rules don't expressly require you to move into coherency in the assault phase, the assault rules themselves require coherency.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/11/29 04:56:12


 
   
Made in jp
Longtime Dakkanaut



Aizuwakamatsu, Fukushima, Japan

They do, because each model moved must end it's move in coherency with one that has already moved. Obviously the first model to move doesn't have to end in coherency, but every subsequent model must be able to trace a chain of coherency back to the first model moved.
   
Made in us
The Hive Mind





whembly wrote:However, I don't think I've ever had this case happen to me before... o.O

Well, with the new idea that you can deploy a squad split in half on either end of the table to give your entire army 4+ cover, you might see it more often.

My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals.
 
   
Made in us
Captain of the Forlorn Hope





Chicago, IL

Yes it is okay to use an assault to restore coherency, if the unit in question is fleet. Since you have to run to restore coherency, if you are still not in coherency you can restore via assault, but since you would have to run in the shooting phase, you need fleet to assault.

"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.

I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!

We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
 
   
Made in au
[MOD]
Making Stuff






Under the couch

rigeld2 wrote:
whembly wrote:However, I don't think I've ever had this case happen to me before... o.O

Well, with the new idea that you can deploy a squad split in half on either end of the table to give your entire army 4+ cover, you might see it more often.

It's not exactly a new idea. And nobody in their right mind would try it on the table in a serious game.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2011/11/29 06:49:54


 
   
Made in us
Sinewy Scourge




Grand ol US of A

Actually I don't think you can. You can't make any optional choices until you have restored coherency and launching an assault seems like an optional choice to me.

Granted I would have no problem with an opponent doing this in a friendly game as it just makes sense that they are trying to get back together at any cost and stumbled into an enemy squad.

d3m01iti0n wrote:
BT uses the Codex Astartes as toilet paper. They’re an Imp Fist successor, recruit from multiple planets, and are known to be the largest Chapter in the galaxy. They’re on a constant Crusade, keeping it real for the Emperor and not bumming around like the other guys. They hate psykers and can’t ally with them. They’re basically an entire chapter of Chaplains. CC lunatics. What every Space Marine should aspire to be, if not trapped in a Matt Ward nightmare.

 
   
Made in us
The Hive Mind





Akroma06 wrote:Actually I don't think you can. You can't make any optional choices until you have restored coherency and launching an assault seems like an optional choice to me.

Why do you say that? The only things the rules say you must do is move to restore coherency, and Run! to restore coherency. There's no restrictions on voluntary actions.

My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals.
 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




Akroma - no such rule exists, actually.
   
Made in us
Wicked Canoptek Wraith






Thanks, I realize this is a very specific question.

Ya, I play Crons, what about it?
Also, they are just shiny space zombies with guns.

6700 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: