| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2011/12/28 22:38:27
Subject: Do flamers still negate Cover Saves?
|
|
Been Around the Block
|
Do flamers and heavy flamers ignore cover saves? If so, where would that rule be listed? Codex or BRB? Thanks in advance!
Zarry
|
"There is one rule, above all others, for a man. Whatever comes, face it on your feet." -- al'Lan Mandragoran |
|
|
 |
|
2011/12/28 22:43:21
Subject: Do flamers still negate Cover Saves?
|
|
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Yes, all template weapons do. P29
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011/12/28 22:50:59
Subject: Re:Do flamers still negate Cover Saves?
|
|
Been Around the Block
|
Thank you very much! That one has been driving us crazy!
|
"There is one rule, above all others, for a man. Whatever comes, face it on your feet." -- al'Lan Mandragoran |
|
|
|
|
2011/12/28 22:52:24
Subject: Do flamers still negate Cover Saves?
|
|
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
And just to be clear... By 'template' weapons, I mean the teardrop template. Not the large or small blast markers, which are not templates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011/12/29 17:57:29
Subject: Do flamers still negate Cover Saves?
|
|
Sinewy Scourge
Grand ol US of A
|
Just to be more clear it isn't the name "flamer" or "heavy flamer" that ignores cover. It is the fact that it uses a 'template' that ignores cover.
|
d3m01iti0n wrote:
BT uses the Codex Astartes as toilet paper. They’re an Imp Fist successor, recruit from multiple planets, and are known to be the largest Chapter in the galaxy. They’re on a constant Crusade, keeping it real for the Emperor and not bumming around like the other guys. They hate psykers and can’t ally with them. They’re basically an entire chapter of Chaplains. CC lunatics. What every Space Marine should aspire to be, if not trapped in a Matt Ward nightmare.
|
|
|
|
|
2011/12/29 18:01:24
Subject: Do flamers still negate Cover Saves?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Yes, it's key to note that it's the tear template that negates cover not flamer weaponry. BA have a shotgun type weapon that uses the teardrop that always surprises folks in the fact that it negates cover as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011/12/30 00:50:22
Subject: Do flamers still negate Cover Saves?
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
IG chem cannon... yes!
|
|
|
|
|
2011/12/30 03:02:29
Subject: Do flamers still negate Cover Saves?
|
|
Screaming Shining Spear
|
Not to mention a number of scary dark eldar weapons...
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011/12/30 18:36:51
Subject: Do flamers still negate Cover Saves?
|
|
Ork Boy Hangin' off a Trukk
|
a few of the bug weapons surprise people with that as well
|
chromedog wrote:You don't use iron-ons on minis ...
 |
|
|
|
|
2011/12/30 18:49:10
Subject: Do flamers still negate Cover Saves?
|
|
Sinewy Scourge
Grand ol US of A
|
I know the DE have some nasty toys just to toss one out a liquifier. I know there is an IG LRBT variant that can ignore cover.
|
d3m01iti0n wrote:
BT uses the Codex Astartes as toilet paper. They’re an Imp Fist successor, recruit from multiple planets, and are known to be the largest Chapter in the galaxy. They’re on a constant Crusade, keeping it real for the Emperor and not bumming around like the other guys. They hate psykers and can’t ally with them. They’re basically an entire chapter of Chaplains. CC lunatics. What every Space Marine should aspire to be, if not trapped in a Matt Ward nightmare.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
