Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/30 08:59:16
Subject: MW SAS Squadron any good?
|
 |
Armored Iron Breaker
|
I was having a look at my new Burning Empires Book, and I had look at the SAS squadron, 20 jeeps at 1000 points, plus some MG's attached to them. I was just curious on how this army would play against other mid war armies. Cause I thought It was a EW list. But against MW tanks and AT's. I'm just concerned on how this army would act in a competitive state. Or is this army just really for scenario type of games. And what I mean by Scenario games, is that the game is setup with certain types of rules and restriction on what each person can take and have. Any input would be nice.
Cheers
Simon
|
Lots
Dwarfs: Lots
"Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat."
Check out my blog at: averydwarfishblog.blogspot.com |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/30 11:09:56
Subject: MW SAS Squadron any good?
|
 |
Krazed Killa Kan
|
Are you looking at a Raiding Force? Because it sounds like you're looking at one of the many raiding forces in Burning Empires.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/31 00:22:26
Subject: MW SAS Squadron any good?
|
 |
Armored Iron Breaker
|
Yes it is a raiding force.
|
Lots
Dwarfs: Lots
"Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat."
Check out my blog at: averydwarfishblog.blogspot.com |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/31 03:49:53
Subject: Re:MW SAS Squadron any good?
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
I would imagine that it would do alright against infantry or mech lists. But most of the raiding lists will get curbstomped by enemy armor lists.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/31 08:57:01
Subject: MW SAS Squadron any good?
|
 |
Armored Iron Breaker
|
Yea that was my first thought as well.
|
Lots
Dwarfs: Lots
"Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat."
Check out my blog at: averydwarfishblog.blogspot.com |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/01 13:34:46
Subject: MW SAS Squadron any good?
|
 |
Sergeant First Class
Northern VA
|
Its not designed to play against "actual" armies. Its designed to go against other raiding party lists, and more importantly, playing the raiding party scenarios.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/02 04:44:15
Subject: MW SAS Squadron any good?
|
 |
Armored Iron Breaker
|
Yea thats what I thought, I was just simply checking ;D
Cheers
|
Lots
Dwarfs: Lots
"Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat."
Check out my blog at: averydwarfishblog.blogspot.com |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/04 18:05:52
Subject: MW SAS Squadron any good?
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
Hatfield, PA
|
ParatrooperSimon wrote:I was having a look at my new Burning Empires Book, and I had look at the SAS squadron, 20 jeeps at 1000 points, plus some MG's attached to them. I was just curious on how this army would play against other mid war armies. Cause I thought It was a EW list. But against MW tanks and AT's. I'm just concerned on how this army would act in a competitive state. Or is this army just really for scenario type of games. And what I mean by Scenario games, is that the game is setup with certain types of rules and restriction on what each person can take and have. Any input would be nice.
The raiding forces lists can be used in EW and MW, but are primarily geared towards fighting other raiding forces and using the raiding forces scenarios in Burning Empires. A 1000 point SAS squadron would get completely flattened against a 1000 point armored list and while it might do OK against a 1000 point mechanized or infantry force it would still be kind of small and specialized for an out-out battle with those regular lists.
Skriker
|
CSM 6k points CSM 4k points
CSM 4.5k points CSM 3.5k points
 and Daemons 4k points each
Renegades 4k points
SM 4k points
SM 2.5k Points
3K 2.3k
EW, MW and LW British in Flames of War |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/05 07:08:05
Subject: MW SAS Squadron any good?
|
 |
Major
Middle Earth
|
Does the list have access to smoke bombardments in any form? That's usually how you run a small elite force. Smoke and assault. if I recall SAS are good at blowing up tanks in assault.
|
We're watching you... scum. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/06 21:27:50
Subject: MW SAS Squadron any good?
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
Hatfield, PA
|
EmilCrane wrote:Does the list have access to smoke bombardments in any form? That's usually how you run a small elite force. Smoke and assault. if I recall SAS are good at blowing up tanks in assault.
Not really much by way of artillery support due to the fact that SAS was hit and fade. Trying to recall specifically, but I am guessing there should be some minimal mortar smoke, but not any real solid capability to throw smoke. Their job was to rush in, get the job done and get out, and not to be around long enough to need artillery support.
Skriker
|
CSM 6k points CSM 4k points
CSM 4.5k points CSM 3.5k points
 and Daemons 4k points each
Renegades 4k points
SM 4k points
SM 2.5k Points
3K 2.3k
EW, MW and LW British in Flames of War |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/06 21:57:14
Subject: MW SAS Squadron any good?
|
 |
Major
Middle Earth
|
Skriker wrote:EmilCrane wrote:Does the list have access to smoke bombardments in any form? That's usually how you run a small elite force. Smoke and assault. if I recall SAS are good at blowing up tanks in assault.
Not really much by way of artillery support due to the fact that SAS was hit and fade. Trying to recall specifically, but I am guessing there should be some minimal mortar smoke, but not any real solid capability to throw smoke. Their job was to rush in, get the job done and get out, and not to be around long enough to need artillery support.
Skriker
Mortar smoke is probably all you need, you just need to cover your guys as they rush in and kill things.
|
We're watching you... scum. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/11 20:20:27
Subject: Re:MW SAS Squadron any good?
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
Hatfield, PA
|
Just to follow up...was checking the list last night and the SAS patrols get *zero* support of any kind for smoke or artillery. So definitely will be tough to succeed with them against non-raiding forces at the same points total.
Skriker
|
CSM 6k points CSM 4k points
CSM 4.5k points CSM 3.5k points
 and Daemons 4k points each
Renegades 4k points
SM 4k points
SM 2.5k Points
3K 2.3k
EW, MW and LW British in Flames of War |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/11 21:00:59
Subject: MW SAS Squadron any good?
|
 |
Krazed Killa Kan
|
The only way you can play against non-raiding forces is if you're playing a Raiding Mission.
The Raiding Missions have built in ways to even out the fact that you have a raiding force attacking a full army. Usually the Garrison force will have a lot less stuff on the table to start, or none at all, and reserves will trickle in.
Meanwhile, the raiding force should have access to interdiction raids, which can delay enemy reinforcements.
Raiding games overall are fast and furious, being over in 1 hour or so.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|