Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/06 18:52:29
Subject: Do older books have more personality?
|
 |
Powerful Irongut
Bedford UK
|
Is it me, or are armies for fantasy (AND 40K) just getting blander and more homogenous?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/06 19:04:35
Subject: Re:Do older books have more personality?
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
I can't really speak for other books, but the Ogre book really expanded on the old fluff and added more awsome sauce. there were a couple of minor changes that were a little odd but tolerable.
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/06 19:17:15
Subject: Do older books have more personality?
|
 |
Fanatic with Madcap Mushrooms
|
The fantasy books never get bland and we have been seeing a expansion of fluff and flavour in the newer books
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/06 19:17:20
Subject: Do older books have more personality?
|
 |
Scouting Shadow Warrior
|
I don't know about the other books, but my current High Elves and Dwarves books certainly have a lot less fluff in them than the older editions.
The armies themselves, are very different. In the old days, it was mostly just different stats/equipment. Now there's tons of unique rules for every unit.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/06 19:24:07
Subject: Re:Do older books have more personality?
|
 |
Crazed Gorger
|
Grey Templar wrote:I can't really speak for other books, but the Ogre book really expanded on the old fluff and added more awsome sauce. there were a couple of minor changes that were a little odd but tolerable.
Yeah the new ogre book is really good for the most part. The old book wasn't that bad but the new book is far better.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/06 19:26:45
Subject: Do older books have more personality?
|
 |
Powerful Irongut
Bedford UK
|
It's just me then I guess....:/
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/06 19:31:04
Subject: Do older books have more personality?
|
 |
Fanatic with Madcap Mushrooms
|
You are right about 40k though. But then again 40k was never as cool as WHFB
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/06 20:06:44
Subject: Do older books have more personality?
|
 |
Scribe of Dhunia
|
Jeep wrote:I don't know about the other books, but my current High Elves and Dwarves books certainly have a lot less fluff in them than the older editions.
The armies themselves, are very different. In the old days, it was mostly just different stats/equipment. Now there's tons of unique rules for every unit.
I think this is probably true, but only because in the old books, they didn't have as many units or unique rules, so they could use more of the page space to add fluff to them. The new books so far have definitely expanded on the fluff more though, so it's possible we'll see more and more back story in the new books for each army.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/06 20:23:34
Subject: Do older books have more personality?
|
 |
Camouflaged Zero
Where the sun crosses the field of blood.
|
To me, it seems that they add on an expand the flavour, but try to limit flavourful items and abilities, streamlining it as much as possible... But still expanding upon the different unit choices.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/06 21:55:10
Subject: Do older books have more personality?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Well, there's game balance and fluff. And a bit of crossover. The crazy items just didn't work because Army Books have to hang around for years and they may reference rules or concepts that no longer apply. Of course, they could FAQ that stuff, but they don't.
Ogres are awesome. TK I think expanded a lot as well. O&G are fairly the same, IMHO.
40K is just a cash cow. It's a totally different concept and marketing strategy. They will make a new Space Marine book for all 409238498235689 chapters if people keep buying them.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/07 00:11:01
Subject: Do older books have more personality?
|
 |
Powerful Irongut
|
Yep, it's just you.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/07 00:19:24
Subject: Re:Do older books have more personality?
|
 |
Cold-Blooded Saurus Warrior
|
Yeah I don't mind the fluff in this Lizardmen codex. I didn't read the old one but I can see by common consensus that your alone in this one, lol.
|
Check out my Channel
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheWarhammerFatKids
The Restrictions I Put On My Tallarn Lists:
- Missile Launchers are the only HW teams allowed in Infantry Squads.
- All units able to take the FW Desert Raider special rule, must take it in lists of 750 points or more.
- 1 unit of 10 Rough Riders is required for lists of 1000 points or more.
- 2 units of Mukaali Rough Riders are required for lists of 1000 points or more.
- No vehicles besides Chimera Armoured Transports and Hydra Flak Tank Batteries are allowed.
- Al'Rahem is required in lists of 1000 points or more. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/07 06:51:04
Subject: Do older books have more personality?
|
 |
Powerful Irongut
Bedford UK
|
The Cornerfag~ wrote:To me, it seems that they add on an expand the flavour, but try to limit flavourful items and abilities, streamlining it as much as possible... But still expanding upon the different unit choices.
This is really what I was getting at.
I asked this while thinking about the thread about Dwarfs and speulating about their new book, whenever that might be. The thoughts expressed on thier are remakablbly similar; runes will be slimmed down, artillary nerfed,some sort of tank/animated construct/"big monster" will be produced......I think the trend is to give each army everything.
Lets look at Ogres. The old book had them as a fott slogging bunch a monsterous infantry with some ok but wacky shooting and a deent war machine. Now they have access to cavalry, better shooting and an even better warmacihine..Now look at the Vampire Counts models leaked; they will have monsterous infantry too, and they already have big monsters. Contast this with older VC's where troop qualiity was poor, but magic was a lot better and they used raising as a path to victory.
In both examples I would argue that the older incarnations were more distinct and had more personality than the new ones. I am not saying that they were better as armies, because having more options always makes an army better, I am just saying that some of the personality has gone.The best analogy I can think of is a car company selling a dozen models under differnt names, but their mechanics are all the same.
Obviously, this is to balance the game. I just wonder if by doing so we get so many shades of grey. Could it have been done differently? I don't know.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/07 16:50:29
Subject: Do older books have more personality?
|
 |
Fanatic with Madcap Mushrooms
|
But on the vampires thing I remember a time when vamps could choose a very different path than raising for victory. And depending on your bloodline magic might not matter at ALL!
Ogres had calv in their last book also, it was just through FW.
And as for the dwarf rune system they really need to be slimmed down as when I see Crown Of Command on a army list I know what it does, but when I see Rune Of Grungi I have not the foggyest.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/08 08:26:00
Subject: Do older books have more personality?
|
 |
Powerful Irongut
Bedford UK
|
Ok, so I couuld cough up some money for FW Rhinox Cav-that wasn't very common..And the Vamps having multiple paths, bloodlines and the like only adds to their personality in the first book-something that had been sucked out in the 7th book with the removal of bloodlines.
While I admit it must be frustrating, the rune system is a brilliant, flavourful, flexible sysytem that defines stunties......I'm sure, however, the less poular runes will be pruned, and the more powerful ones diluted.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/08 19:20:44
Subject: Re:Do older books have more personality?
|
 |
Stalwart Veteran Guard Sergeant
|
The WE book seems to have very little on the fluff side, whereas my friend's Skaven and High Elf books are stuffed to the brim, haha xD
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/09 04:10:26
Subject: Do older books have more personality?
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
I think the fluff in the books is getting better in some respects, however just read the old undead army book from the early 90's and that can give you nightmares
|
|
 |
 |
|