Switch Theme:

Skimmer Question?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




Does anyone know where the part about skimmers is that you need a 4+ in cc to hit them even if they didn't move or did I just make that up?
   
Made in jp
Longtime Dakkanaut



Aizuwakamatsu, Fukushima, Japan

That was a 4th edition rule. Doesn't exist in 5th, skimmers are hit just like any other vehicle.
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




thanks a lot
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




It was a 6+ as well.
   
Made in us
Sinewy Scourge




Grand ol US of A

nosferatu1001 wrote:It was a 6+ as well.

Yep. It was a 4 for DE raiders with nets.

d3m01iti0n wrote:
BT uses the Codex Astartes as toilet paper. They’re an Imp Fist successor, recruit from multiple planets, and are known to be the largest Chapter in the galaxy. They’re on a constant Crusade, keeping it real for the Emperor and not bumming around like the other guys. They hate psykers and can’t ally with them. They’re basically an entire chapter of Chaplains. CC lunatics. What every Space Marine should aspire to be, if not trapped in a Matt Ward nightmare.

 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: