Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I'd ask if you'd consider Eldar, but they can be pretty punishing.

Still, a rather versatile set of units that can work in perfect coherency... they've got a tool to do everything and they are highly mobile. They're also rather pretty.

Sound appealing?

I don't think I've found an army I enjoy yet, but hey, I don't play very often; to me it's *all* about aesthetics and fluff. I don't give two hoots for gameplay.

KingCracker wrote:How about jumping more then just the ship, become AWOL with GW entirely. This year, its what Im doing, and Im already enjoying it

Why?

If we're willing to pay the money and don't utterly despise Matt Ward (entirely), there's really no reason to do so.

I love the setting, I took a break from GW for a few months to concentrate on some WWII stuff, but now I'm back and enjoying myself just as much as I ever have... Not that this makes your point invalid, I'm just questioning its sense.