Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/16 18:01:10
Subject: Is it just me, or is Codex: Chaos Daemons a lot of fun to read?
|
 |
Battlefortress Driver with Krusha Wheel
|
I love the way the book is written.
Usually you'd open a book like this and it would be from the point of view of an outsider explaining how horrible these being are.
This book is mostly comprised of almost poetic rhetoric of how wonderful and beautiful the warp, it's denizens and their unholy powers are.
Love it!
Opinions?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/16 18:03:07
Subject: Is it just me, or is Codex: Chaos Daemons a lot of fun to read?
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
I'm a big fan of it.
It reminds me of the older 40K stuff. There are a number of in-jokes and hidden references that you just don't find in recent codexes, which take themselves WAY too seriously.
The rules...maybe not so much in places, but the book as a whole is awesomesauce
|
The Viletide: Daemons of Nurgle/Deathguard: 7400 pts
Disclples of the Dragon - Ad Mech - about 2000 pts
GSC - about 2000 Pts
Rhulic Mercs - um...many...
Circle Oroboros - 300 Pts or so
Menoth - 300+ pts
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/16 18:03:20
Subject: Re:Is it just me, or is Codex: Chaos Daemons a lot of fun to read?
|
 |
Rampaging Reaver Titan Princeps
On your roof with a laptop
|
Yes, I also think its good. Very well written, with fluff thats actually quite good and balenced.
A good read.
|
This is a signature. It contains words of an important or meaningful nature. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/16 18:42:54
Subject: Re:Is it just me, or is Codex: Chaos Daemons a lot of fun to read?
|
 |
Evasive Pleasureseeker
Lost in a blizzard, somewhere near Toronto
|
The only codex I enjoyed reading more was Codex: Orks.
The background in the Daemons book is awsome and gives that real idea that nothing you do actually matters, because in the end, all fall to chaos.
The rules do work pretty well too, despite the internet belief that our deployment is a complete gakfest. The only main problems being;
- the rolling off to see which wave comes in is pretty dumb.
- not nearly enough ranged anti-tank. (and GK's say they have it tough?!)
- GK's existing.
- Lack of unit choices. (would you like, I6 assaulty, 'furious charge' + power toy assaulty, FnP tarpit assaulty, worst unit in the game assaulty...)
I'm hoping that the next Daemons codex simply re-prints the current background and overhauls the army list! Please GW, don't 're-invent' daemons as the new GK's.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/16 19:31:03
Subject: Re:Is it just me, or is Codex: Chaos Daemons a lot of fun to read?
|
 |
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
Wait, this was written by Ward, right?
And its well written? No pretentious bullcrap? No trying to sound epic or sophisticated?
Does not compute
|
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/16 19:48:37
Subject: Is it just me, or is Codex: Chaos Daemons a lot of fun to read?
|
 |
[ARTICLE MOD]
Fixture of Dakka
|
It was not written by Ward, it was written by Alessio and Gav Thorpe.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/16 19:57:23
Subject: Is it just me, or is Codex: Chaos Daemons a lot of fun to read?
|
 |
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
Redbeard wrote:It was not written by Ward, it was written by Alessio and Gav Thorpe.
Then why does Ward get all the flack for demons?
|
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/16 20:01:01
Subject: Is it just me, or is Codex: Chaos Daemons a lot of fun to read?
|
 |
Sadistic Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
I also really liked this codex, I want to see a return to the older codexes like this.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/16 20:02:51
Subject: Is it just me, or is Codex: Chaos Daemons a lot of fun to read?
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
That was Fantasy's Daemons.
Armybook Daemons is the usual Ward crap. Massively OP and unbalanced, with lousy fluff. It pretty much broke the previous editon of WHFB.
40K Daemons Codex is a whole different animal, despite having the same models and units, by and large.
|
The Viletide: Daemons of Nurgle/Deathguard: 7400 pts
Disclples of the Dragon - Ad Mech - about 2000 pts
GSC - about 2000 Pts
Rhulic Mercs - um...many...
Circle Oroboros - 300 Pts or so
Menoth - 300+ pts
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/16 22:32:13
Subject: Is it just me, or is Codex: Chaos Daemons a lot of fun to read?
|
 |
Battlefortress Driver with Krusha Wheel
|
If you haven't read the Codex: Chaos Daemons. You should.
It's worth it.
|
|
 |
 |
|