Switch Theme:

What's better bloodcrusher or paladins?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Poll
what is better for there points Bloodcrushers or Paladins
Bloodcrushers of Khorne
Grey Knight Paladins

View results
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Bane Thrall






I feel that the bloodcrushers are worth there pts more than paladins are. So my question what do you think is better?

kabal of angry dragon 2500pts Daemons 3000pts 5000pts 3rd 1000pts 
   
Made in us
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge





Boston, MA

It's apples and oranges honestly. Do Bloodcrushers have fleet? I think they don't count as cavalry, but a speed bonus would definitely put them over Paladins.

Check out my Youtube channel!
 
   
Made in us
Confessor Of Sins




WA, USA

Yeah, gotta agree with SRM here, apples and oranges. In what role are we putting these models?

 Ouze wrote:

Afterward, Curran killed a guy in the parking lot with a trident.
 
   
Made in us
Shadowy Grot Kommittee Memba




The Great State of New Jersey

As a daemon player, I say Paladins (if you're putting the two units head to head). Bloodcrushers are evil things (especially with Fateweaver support) but Pallies get Nemesis Force Weapons that will strike first (in Halberd form)... let alone the damage that 2 psycannons can cause...

CoALabaer wrote:
Wargamers hate two things: the state of the game and change.
 
   
Made in us
Shepherd





As a stand alone and equal squad size id give the edge to the crushers.

The enemy of my enemy is a bastard so lets kill him too.


 
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut





Norwich

For what?
Need some context, as 'whats better bloodcrusher or paladins' basically means who would win in a fight, and the answer is Paladins.
Bloodcrushers are pretty killy, but only really seem to be in lists with Fateweaver, which is basically Daemon players saying you need that 333 points to make the Bloodcrushers worth while, which then means Paladins probably are better point for point generally. But then I suppose Paladins are better when troops, so need 275 point Draigo, and are also better with Librarian so thats another near 200 points.

There is no 'better' really, its personal opinion, ok you can mathhammer stuff, but its going to be pretty complicated to get an answer to your question.

DC:90-S+G++M--B++I+pW40k08+D++A++/eWD257R++t(S)DM+ 
   
Made in us
Long-Range Land Speeder Pilot





In the battlefield

Paladins don't scare me at all. in fact I would take them over bloodcrushers any day having gone against Fatecrusher I will say that army is the scariest one I have ever played. Not to mention my opponent always rolling really well so I literally can't do anything other then shoot and hope he rolls bad. after that its out of my hands.


So IMO Bloodcrushers handsdown

You are not free whose liberty is won by the rigour of other, more righteous souls. Your are merely protected. Your freedom is parasitic, you suck the honourable man dry and offer nothing in return. You who have enjoyed freedom, who have done nothing to earn it, your time has come. This time you will stand alone and fight for yourselves. Now you will pay for your freedom in the currency of honest toil and human blood.  
   
Made in us
Shunting Grey Knight Interceptor




texas

Pallys pure and simple.

 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: