Switch Theme:

Rules question: Assaulting from a CC Barge  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Poll
[ethics question] Is Assaulting from a CC Barge that used Sweep Attack REALLY okay?
It's fine, FAQ overrules normal rules.
I knew it! You Necron scum and your hax chariot have cheated me for the last time!

View results
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in jp
Proud Triarch Praetorian





Rule dispute came up today playing at the club.
Here’s how it went down:
-My Warscythe Overlord in a CC Barge Sweep Attacks a Land Raider (causing a Wrecked result. had softened it up with a Harp beforehand). Occupants disembark.
-Barge promptly stops just on the other side. Overlord disembarks.
-Barge shoots squad of Marines.
-Overlord assaults remaining Marines (unit is decimated).

My opponent argued the rules stated that if an independent character disembarks from a vehicle that moved in the movement phase, said character can not assault in the assault phase.

Now, I know I’d seen the very tactic I pulled of posted before (that’s where I got the idea from, after all), and sure enough, after a quick search I found this,
"Q: Can a character on a Catacomb Command Barge
target one unit with his Sweep Attack and charge a
different unit in the subsequent Assault phase? (p52)
A: Yes."

... but I couldn't help wonder about it.

Is he really incorrect?
Or has the old “Sweep-Shoot-Slash” Surfboard Lord combo been kinda illegal this whole time?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/02/29 12:47:05


 
   
Made in us
The Hive Mind





He'd be correct if the CCB wasn't open topped.
But it is, so he's wrong.

He can do the same thing out of his Land Raider because it has assault ramps.

My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals.
 
   
Made in jp
Proud Triarch Praetorian





Thank you, sir.
(I knew I was missing something simple).
I shall rub that Dark Angel loving bastard's nose in this information.

 
   
Made in ca
Frightening Flamer of Tzeentch





South Korea

Yup, opened topped means you can disembark then assault. Perfectly legal move as far as I can tell.

 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




Yep, there are also no specific IC related rules that would restrict the IC from assaulting. Your opponent was simply wrong.
However you dont sweep attack then finish moving - you move, then sweep attack a unit you moved over. This makes a difference where you end up not wrecking the land raider, and want to be out of assault range....
   
Made in us
Devastating Dark Reaper




houston

You are correct in that you may assault with it being opened topped. Unless the ccb went flat out.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: