Switch Theme:

They got the INQ all wrong.  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in au
Member of the Malleus





Australia

Gw has ruined the INQ.

Starting with the Greyknights, They are not a stand alone codex! they are part of the ORDO: MALLEUS DAEMON HUNTERS

What the is a brotherhood champion
A SORRY EXCUSE FOR NO CHAPLAIN

Why the hell is there Ordo: Hereticus and Ordo: Xenos Inquisitors
IN A DAMN GREY KNIGHTS CODEX??

ALL GREY KNIGHTS ARE PURE, purifiers are
RUBBISH

Who's Idea was it to think that Greyknights dont use DROP PODS!
THATS THEIR GOD DAMN MAIN TRANSPORT FOR PAGK if you look at the fluff its Drop pods and Teleporters, not freaking metal bawkses and storm turkeys

Storm Raven's in General
ARE RUBBISH
"Hey guys i have a cool idea lets give BA and GK stupid aircraft that has never before been mentioned in 40k and call them storm turkeys"

I don't think I need to explain the hatred for that baby harness robo crap they call dreadknights.
RUBBISH

Lord Kaldro draRUBBISH

Why didn't they Make 3 books:

Ordo Malleus
-Greyknights (no brotherhood champions no storm ravens no Kaldor rubbishface no purifiers no rhinos only drop pods no dreadknights)
-inq forces (grimores and daemon hammers!)

Ordo Hereticus
-Sisters of Battle
-inq forces

Ordo Xenos
-Deathwatch
-inq forces

that way you have 3 fluff friendly unique army's to add into 40k table top.

ILL SEE GW at GamesDay 2012

"I am the hammer,
i am the right hand of my emperor,
the instrument of his will,
the tip of his spear, the edge of his sword"  
   
Made in us
Sister Vastly Superior




Colorado

Grey knights can keep my inquisitor. I am glad my sisters are free of them.

I do however wish the grey knight codex was called Codex :Inquisition and had deathwatch kill teams thrown in there. I would probably play it just for that unit alone.

When in doubt burn it, then burn yourself for doubting. 
   
Made in us
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge





Boston, MA

Jesus Christ, save this kind of vitriol for something that matters. You don't have to use the Inquisitors in your army list. You don't have to use Stormravens. You don't have to use Draigo. Grey Knights don't use drop pods, they use teleportation technology. This is deliberately left out as one of many ways to distinguish GK from typical Space Marine armies. Grey Knights also don't have chaplains; they don't need someone to make sure they're pure. You said it yourself, they're already pure.

Also, for the love of god, don't use capslock, learn how to use apostrophes correctly, and don't make a post like this ever again. Complaining about problems in a codex is one thing, this is just embarrassing.

Check out my Youtube channel!
 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




Maryland

Hm. An interesting idea.

Why not go with an overall Inquisition rulebook? GW's has hit on something that I find interesting in their game design - using HQ choices to 'unlock' certain units and place them into different slots in the FOC.

Take one of the 2-3 Grey Knights HQ choices, and those Elite Grey Knight Strike Squads become troops.

Do the same thing for a couple of Deathwatch commanders, and for a couple of Sisters commanders.

Of course, it would have meant cutting off a great deal of support for the Sisters, but GW has already proven in the past that they don't have a problem wiping an army from the rosters.

And, physco (mispelled?), why not just make a DIY codex?

Also, the unintented hilarity of you paying to go to Gamesday to complain to GW easily washes away the silliness of the rest of your post.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/03/14 05:07:30


   
Made in au
[MOD]
Making Stuff






Under the couch

I would recommend that you try again once you have cooled down a little. The codex has been out for what? A year now?

If you're still this worked up about it, you might want to consider finding a more relaxing hobby for a while.

 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: