Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/25 17:06:25
Subject: Eldar special characters
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
I know I'm probably just missing it somewhere, but is there a "unique" or "0-1" restriction on any of the Eldar named charaters? If so, could someone direct me to it?
|
11,100 pts, 7,000 pts
++ Heed my words for I am the Herald and we are the footsteps of doom. Interlopers, do we name you. Defilers of our
sacred earth. We have awoken to your primative species and will not tolerate your presence. Ours is the way of logic,
of cold hard reason: your irrationality, your human disease has no place in the necrontyr. Flesh is weak.
Surrender to the machine incarnate. Surrender and die. ++
Tuagh wrote: If you won't use a wrench, it isn't the bolt's fault that your hammer is useless. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/25 17:09:08
Subject: Eldar special characters
|
 |
Powerful Phoenix Lord
|
Eldar don't have the "Unique" or "0-1" restriction per se, however the named Characters all have "Individual" which is exactly the same thing.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/03/25 17:10:03
Greebo had spent an irritating two minutes in that box. Technically, a cat locked in a box may be alive or it may be dead. You never know until you look. In fact, the mere act of opening the box will determine the state of the cat, although in this case there were three determinate states the cat could be in: these being Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
Orks always ride in single file to hide their strength and numbers.
Gozer the Gozerian, Gozer the Destructor, Volguus Zildrohar, Gozer the Traveler, and Lord of the Sebouillia |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/25 17:15:31
Subject: Eldar special characters
|
 |
[DCM]
Tilter at Windmills
|
The main rulebook tells us that all named characters are unique, IIRC.
|
Adepticon 2015: Team Tourney Best Imperial Team- Team Ironguts, Adepticon 2014: Team Tourney 6th/120, Best Imperial Team- Cold Steel Mercs 2, 40k Championship Qualifier ~25/226
More 2010-2014 GT/Major RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 78-20-9 // SW: 8-1-2 (Golden Ticket with SW), BA: 29-9-4 6th Ed GT & RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 36-12-2 // BA: 11-4-1 // SW: 1-1-1
DT:70S++++G(FAQ)M++B++I+Pw40k99#+D+++A+++/sWD105R+++T(T)DM+++++
A better way to score Sportsmanship in tournaments
The 40K Rulebook & Codex FAQs. You should have these bookmarked if you play this game.
The Dakka Dakka Forum Rules You agreed to abide by these when you signed up.
Maelstrom's Edge! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/25 17:16:07
Subject: Eldar special characters
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Happyjew wrote:Eldar don't have the "Unique" or "0-1" restriction per se, however the named Characters all have "Individual" which is exactly the same thing.
"Independent Character" is not the same as unique, so I presume you're referring to some other sort of "Individual" reference?
Page 49 "Special Characters" is what places the unique restriction on named characters as I am aware.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/25 17:20:19
Subject: Eldar special characters
|
 |
Powerful Phoenix Lord
|
kmdl1066 wrote:Happyjew wrote:Eldar don't have the "Unique" or "0-1" restriction per se, however the named Characters all have "Individual" which is exactly the same thing.
"Independent Character" is not the same as unique, so I presume you're referring to some other sort of "Individual" reference?
Page 49 "Special Characters" is what places the unique restriction on named characters as I am aware.
Re-read what I wrote, "Individual" not Independent Character.
Eldar codex, page 61 wrote:
Individual: An Eldar army may only include one [insert name here]
|
Greebo had spent an irritating two minutes in that box. Technically, a cat locked in a box may be alive or it may be dead. You never know until you look. In fact, the mere act of opening the box will determine the state of the cat, although in this case there were three determinate states the cat could be in: these being Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
Orks always ride in single file to hide their strength and numbers.
Gozer the Gozerian, Gozer the Destructor, Volguus Zildrohar, Gozer the Traveler, and Lord of the Sebouillia |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/25 17:25:48
Subject: Eldar special characters
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
Mannahnin wrote:The main rulebook tells us that all named characters are unique, IIRC.
kmdl1066 wrote:Happyjew wrote:Eldar don't have the "Unique" or "0-1" restriction per se, however the named Characters all have "Individual" which is exactly the same thing.
"Independent Character" is not the same as unique, so I presume you're referring to some other sort of "Individual" reference?
Page 49 "Special Characters" is what places the unique restriction on named characters as I am aware.
Ahh, that is the tidbit I was forgetting, thank you. I'm too used to the more recent dexes spelling it out specificly for you. So if you were particularly masochistic, could you include two Avatars in a list?
|
11,100 pts, 7,000 pts
++ Heed my words for I am the Herald and we are the footsteps of doom. Interlopers, do we name you. Defilers of our
sacred earth. We have awoken to your primative species and will not tolerate your presence. Ours is the way of logic,
of cold hard reason: your irrationality, your human disease has no place in the necrontyr. Flesh is weak.
Surrender to the machine incarnate. Surrender and die. ++
Tuagh wrote: If you won't use a wrench, it isn't the bolt's fault that your hammer is useless. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/25 17:27:58
Subject: Eldar special characters
|
 |
Powerful Phoenix Lord
|
What does it say right under the stat line for the Avatar?
|
Greebo had spent an irritating two minutes in that box. Technically, a cat locked in a box may be alive or it may be dead. You never know until you look. In fact, the mere act of opening the box will determine the state of the cat, although in this case there were three determinate states the cat could be in: these being Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
Orks always ride in single file to hide their strength and numbers.
Gozer the Gozerian, Gozer the Destructor, Volguus Zildrohar, Gozer the Traveler, and Lord of the Sebouillia |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/25 17:28:12
Subject: Eldar special characters
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
Happyjew wrote:kmdl1066 wrote:Happyjew wrote:Eldar don't have the "Unique" or "0-1" restriction per se, however the named Characters all have "Individual" which is exactly the same thing.
"Independent Character" is not the same as unique, so I presume you're referring to some other sort of "Individual" reference?
Page 49 "Special Characters" is what places the unique restriction on named characters as I am aware.
Re-read what I wrote, "Individual" not Independent Character.
Eldar codex, page 61 wrote:
Individual: An Eldar army may only include one [insert name here]
Interesting, was there more than one printing of the Eldar dex (like the Necron 3rd ed)? I'm not seeing that anywhere on pg 61 of mine.
|
11,100 pts, 7,000 pts
++ Heed my words for I am the Herald and we are the footsteps of doom. Interlopers, do we name you. Defilers of our
sacred earth. We have awoken to your primative species and will not tolerate your presence. Ours is the way of logic,
of cold hard reason: your irrationality, your human disease has no place in the necrontyr. Flesh is weak.
Surrender to the machine incarnate. Surrender and die. ++
Tuagh wrote: If you won't use a wrench, it isn't the bolt's fault that your hammer is useless. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/25 17:28:43
Subject: Eldar special characters
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Happyjew wrote:kmdl1066 wrote:Happyjew wrote:Eldar don't have the "Unique" or "0-1" restriction per se, however the named Characters all have "Individual" which is exactly the same thing.
"Independent Character" is not the same as unique, so I presume you're referring to some other sort of "Individual" reference?
Re-read what I wrote, "Individual" not Independent Character.
Eldar codex, page 61 wrote:
Individual: An Eldar army may only include one [insert name here]
I did indeed read what you wrote. My apologies if I was not clear that I knew you were not referring to Independent Character. I just don't remember running across any specific rules using the term "Individual," and because I'm always missing totally obvious things I thought I would ask. So I did and you answered and I learnt something and am happy. (You of course come predefined as happy and so have what I feel is an unfair advantage in that regard.  )
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/25 17:31:00
Subject: Eldar special characters
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
Happyjew wrote:What does it say right under the stat line for the Avatar?
Unit Type: Monstrous Creature
then to the other side:
Wargear: The Wailing Doom
Special Rules: Daemon; Fearless; Molten Body; Inspiring; Monstrous Creature
|
11,100 pts, 7,000 pts
++ Heed my words for I am the Herald and we are the footsteps of doom. Interlopers, do we name you. Defilers of our
sacred earth. We have awoken to your primative species and will not tolerate your presence. Ours is the way of logic,
of cold hard reason: your irrationality, your human disease has no place in the necrontyr. Flesh is weak.
Surrender to the machine incarnate. Surrender and die. ++
Tuagh wrote: If you won't use a wrench, it isn't the bolt's fault that your hammer is useless. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/25 17:37:38
Subject: Eldar special characters
|
 |
Powerful Phoenix Lord
|
It's possible that the first printing of the 4th ed codex did not have the "Individual" rule for the Avatar. My copy came out after the previous FAQ was released (all the errata already taken into account). If so, he is Unique.
|
Greebo had spent an irritating two minutes in that box. Technically, a cat locked in a box may be alive or it may be dead. You never know until you look. In fact, the mere act of opening the box will determine the state of the cat, although in this case there were three determinate states the cat could be in: these being Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
Orks always ride in single file to hide their strength and numbers.
Gozer the Gozerian, Gozer the Destructor, Volguus Zildrohar, Gozer the Traveler, and Lord of the Sebouillia |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/25 17:40:39
Subject: Re:Eldar special characters
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
Cool. I'll have to compare it to my buddy's dex which he purchased fairly recently.
|
11,100 pts, 7,000 pts
++ Heed my words for I am the Herald and we are the footsteps of doom. Interlopers, do we name you. Defilers of our
sacred earth. We have awoken to your primative species and will not tolerate your presence. Ours is the way of logic,
of cold hard reason: your irrationality, your human disease has no place in the necrontyr. Flesh is weak.
Surrender to the machine incarnate. Surrender and die. ++
Tuagh wrote: If you won't use a wrench, it isn't the bolt's fault that your hammer is useless. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/25 17:46:08
Subject: Eldar special characters
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
The ruins of the Palace of Thorns
|
My Eldar 'dex has a few mistakes in it that are corrected in later print runs.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|