Switch Theme:

Article Discussion: Grey Knight Tactica (Elites)  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb



This is an automated message added by the articles system.

A new article titled Grey Knight Tactica (Elites) has been added to the dakka articles system.

This message thread is for the discussion of content in the article.

If you have anything to add to the article, then just jump in and edit it by going to the actual article page and clicking 'edit' (the link can be found just above the article). If there is no edit link then the article is locked for now, so just add your comments or content to this thread and if they are appropriate then they should eventually get merged in.

If there is something in the article that you wish to debate or comment on, then this is the place to do it. Just hit the reply button and get chatting! You need to be registered and logged in to post in the forums so if you are an anonymous article editor then now would be a great time to register and join in dakka's great forum discussion!
   
Made in au
[MOD]
Not as Good as a Minion






Brisbane

I disagree with a few of the points raised here, including the 'casual' status of inquisitorial servitors. Also, you missed the uses of a techmarine with grenades.

Apart from small things like that, and I'm just nitpicking, not bad mate.

I wish I had time for all the game systems I own, let alone want to own... 
   
Made in gb
Trustworthy Shas'vre






Dorset, UK

motyak wrote:I disagree with a few of the points raised here, including the 'casual' status of inquisitorial servitors. Also, you missed the uses of a techmarine with grenades.

Apart from small things like that, and I'm just nitpicking, not bad mate.


Cheers, I've added Rad Grenades into the Techmarine entry now, Also, onto your Servitor point, I find they rarely work, unless monitored by an inquisitor but even then they are fairly unreliable, it depends on how you kit them out, I prefer Jokaeros over them so i put them as the casual.

Another Thing, is there any way i can move my articles into the Inquisitorial Tactica section or do the moderators move it there?

Thanks,

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/04/01 14:05:43


 
   
Made in gb
Water-Caste Negotiator





Nice article, i agree with most of it but i think you made a mistake on the Paladin section where you got them mixed up with purifiers when writing about the Psycannon.
   
Made in gb
Trustworthy Shas'vre






Dorset, UK

Cheers Rog, fixed it
   
Made in au
[MOD]
Not as Good as a Minion






Brisbane

In terms of servitors, they can actually be quite nasty in a unit with 2 Jokaero and coteaz (and a few warrior acolytes for extra wounds). I agree they are almost beyond useless without an inquisitor, but that has to be taken in to account when you run them. They are a not bad way to bring fire support into the army (which can have a crack at DS'ing enemies nearby with coteaz in the unit), but I respect that if you haven't found a good us for them, it may have just been that I've been lucky using them.

I wish I had time for all the game systems I own, let alone want to own... 
   
Made in gb
Tower of Power






Cannock

Don't get me wrong, it's a good article for newbie players to G.K so they can see what works and what doesn't. I wouldn't say it's a tactica article though as it has nothing on tactics. I would say this is more of a unit guide, review or rating.

warhammer 40,000 tactica and hobby blog - www.imperiusdominatus.com

Want list feedback and advice? e-mail imperiusdominatus@live.co.uk

Blood Angels - 2000 Iron Warriors - 2000 Orks -2000 Imperial Guard - 2000
Eldar - 2000 Hive Fleet Krakken - 2000 Dark Eldar - 2000 Necrons - 2000 Grey Knights - 2000 Daemons - 2000 Ravenwing - 2000 
   
Made in gb
Trustworthy Shas'vre






Dorset, UK

mercer wrote:Don't get me wrong, it's a good article for newbie players to G.K so they can see what works and what doesn't. I wouldn't say it's a tactica article though as it has nothing on tactics. I would say this is more of a unit guide, review or rating.

This tactica is going to be in several parts, first the unit review, then the sample army lists and tactics, so there will be a 'How to Equip Your' and 'what to do' section later in the article after the unit reviews have been complete so you can see how all of the competitive elements fit together for example.
   
Made in gb
Tower of Power






Cannock

Ok

warhammer 40,000 tactica and hobby blog - www.imperiusdominatus.com

Want list feedback and advice? e-mail imperiusdominatus@live.co.uk

Blood Angels - 2000 Iron Warriors - 2000 Orks -2000 Imperial Guard - 2000
Eldar - 2000 Hive Fleet Krakken - 2000 Dark Eldar - 2000 Necrons - 2000 Grey Knights - 2000 Daemons - 2000 Ravenwing - 2000 
   
 
Forum Index » Article Discussion
Go to: