Switch Theme:

Slayer locks  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Been Around the Block





Could a slayer potentially arm lock on turn one. Use it's other open fist to arm lock on turn two. And proceed to head butt away?


Automatically Appended Next Post:
By head butt I mean, attack with it's tusks.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/04/03 23:08:38


 
   
Made in us
Painlord Titan Princeps of Slaanesh




No, the rules says that while you put a lock on an opponent you may make no other power attacks of any type. Hordes page 51.
   
Made in gb
Bane Lord Tartar Sauce





Oxford, Great Britain

If a model is locking a different jack it is unable to make another power attack so no wrestling the jack to the ground :(

Nice idea though. The seether might be more up your street with its free power attack.
   
Made in us
Fanatic with Madcap Mushrooms






Chino Hills, CA

From his edit, the answer would be yes. But you'd have to buy the attack with focus.

So:

No headbutt power attack

Yes Tusk attack, but you'd need to spend a focus. You can even attack with the other claw if you'd like to instead.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/04/04 03:15:58


Some people play to win, some people play for fun. Me? I play to kill toy soldiers.
DR:90S++GMB++IPwh40k206#+D++A++/hWD350R+++T(S)DM+

WHFB, AoS, 40k, WM/H, Starship Troopers Miniatures, FoW

 
   
Made in ca
Dakka Veteran





Canada

Since that plan won't work, let me suggest this instead. Lock them from the back. They can't attempt to break free, since you're not in melee range, and are unable to move. Of course, the planets would have to align to create an instance in where you'd, and can, do this without risking your jack.
   
Made in us
Wraith






Milton, WI

Telekinesis.

Retribution has Rahn, Cryx has Scaverous. I think there is at least one other out there.

Bam, said the lady!
DR:70S+GM++B+I+Pw40k09/f++D++A(WTF)/hWD153R+++T(S)DM++++
Dakka, what is good in life?
To crush other websites,
See their user posts driven before you,
And hear the lamentation of the newbs.
-Frazzled-10/22/09 
   
Made in us
Been Around the Block





Malice possession combo? Walk him over to my insert hvy and turn him around.
   
Made in ca
Dakka Veteran





Canada

True true, I need to read up more faction books.
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka






Lancaster PA

Doesn't the lock power attack mean you give up all your other initial attacks like most power attacks? Meaning you would have to spend focus to get any extra attacks.


Woad to WAR... on Celts blog, which is mostly Circle Orboros
"I'm sick of auto-penetrating attacks against my behind!" - Kungfuhustler 
   
Made in gb
Bane Lord Tartar Sauce





Oxford, Great Britain

yea. If you read the other post we explain why the OP's scenario won't work but give ways in which a similar result can be created.
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka






Lancaster PA

Ok, gotcha. I was reading that as saying "Can't power attack (headbutt) but can swing with the other arm or head. I didn't put together the extra focus bit with that for some reason.
Thanks.


Woad to WAR... on Celts blog, which is mostly Circle Orboros
"I'm sick of auto-penetrating attacks against my behind!" - Kungfuhustler 
   
 
Forum Index » Privateer Press Miniature Games (Warmachine & Hordes)
Go to: