Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
Nocturn wrote:I foresee this creating problems, especially since this is a tipping profession.
They could always put a jar on the stage for dimes, and throw the $ .90 worth of coins, but the strippers may not like that.
Did congressmen conduct a research on 'Stripper club cash routings'? they need to know where exactly money flows.
so they can point out who should pay more.
Kilkrazy wrote:It's bad news for art colleges. They'll need to stump up that much more to pay their nude models.
But, thats Art, and should not be a factor,.. could it? I did not think about that.
I use models for my work, but they are just that, Models.
Granted i have friends with their minds in the sewer, or just walked out of their caves, and make crude/rude/ignorant replys. but their numbers should be few, people are more Mature then that right?
Kilkrazy wrote:It's bad news for art colleges. They'll need to stump up that much more to pay their nude models.
But, thats Art, and should not be a factor,.. could it? I did not think about that.
I use models for my work, but they are just that, Models.
Granted i have friends with their minds in the sewer, or just walked out of their caves, and make crude/rude/ignorant replys. but their numbers should be few, people are more Mature then that right?
The art world is hurting as it is.
but you need a considerable amount of money to hire a modelswoman for that.... if you choose to use a living individual
dunno who's cheaper?
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/05/19 17:06:46
The centre of a massive brood chamber, heaving and pulsating.
Once again, America leads the world in sexual repression.
Squigsquasher, resident ban magnet, White Knight, and general fethwit.
buddha wrote: I've decided that these GW is dead/dying threads that pop up every-week must be followers and cultists of nurgle perpetuating the need for decay. I therefore declare that that such threads are heresy and subject to exterminatus. So says the Inquisition!
Squigsquasher wrote:Once again, America leads the world in sexual repression.
The Japanese are far more sexually repressed, which is rather disturbing if you think about it.
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog
10% is a whole lot of money, for something as unregulated as tips. Let's say a woman makes 800$ in a night. She has to fork over 80$ to uncle sam for showing her god given assets and giving a few horny old men a tease?
Nocturn wrote:Well, considering that the strippers already pay with all of their dignity, it should fall on the club's income.
Agreed. That's if they have any dignity to begin with.
Ooh, misogynistic as well as opposed to gay rights. Not at all surprised those go hand in hand.
I disagree with that statement. Anyone who works in a pornographic industry has little to no dignity in my opinion. I don't hate women, I want humans to respect their bodies. I treat women like a gentlemen unlike some people.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/05/19 15:28:35
Nocturn wrote:Where is anybody bashing gay rights?
Rockerbikie in a thread running along side this in this section. Just because a woman takes her clothes off as part of her profession doesn't mean you can sneer at her for not having any dignity to lose. How pathetic. Nothing gentlemanly about that conduct.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/05/19 15:30:17
Nocturn wrote:Where is anybody bashing gay rights?
Rockerbikie in a thread running along side this in this section. Just because a woman takes her clothes off as part of her profession doesn't mean you can sneer at her for not having any dignity to lose. How pathetic. Nothing gentlemanly about that conduct.
It is morally deplorable. I like women who actually are subtle and act in an acceptable manner. I believe it is quite acceptable to choose not to associate with those types of people. I have the choice to deny friendship. I see no problem with sneering at someone who is doing something morally wrong.
Samus_aran115 wrote:10% is a whole lot of money, for something as unregulated as tips. Let's say a woman makes 800$ in a night. She has to fork over 80$ to uncle sam for showing her god given assets and giving a few horny old men a tease?
The strippers I knew back in the day coughed more cash than that up to support alcohol/drug habits.
Nocturn wrote:Where is anybody bashing gay rights?
Rockerbikie in a thread running along side this in this section. Just because a woman takes her clothes off as part of her profession doesn't mean you can sneer at her for not having any dignity to lose. How pathetic. Nothing gentlemanly about that conduct.
It is morally deplorable. I like women who actually are subtle and act in an acceptable manner. I believe it is quite acceptable to choose not to associate with those types of people. I have the choice to deny friendship. I see no problem with sneering at someone who is doing something morally wrong.
See, I don't think it's right to sneer at a whole group of people I don't know and who hurt no one, simply because I don't approve of their work. For someone who in their last post made a boast how they treat women like a gentleman... I guess a woman is only worth treating with respect if they conform to your personal beliefs as to what is an 'acceptable manner'. Otherwise they are fair game to sneer at and show disgust. That is exactly not how a gentleman behaves.
Nocturn wrote:Where is anybody bashing gay rights?
Rockerbikie in a thread running along side this in this section. Just because a woman takes her clothes off as part of her profession doesn't mean you can sneer at her for not having any dignity to lose. How pathetic. Nothing gentlemanly about that conduct.
It is morally deplorable. I like women who actually are subtle and act in an acceptable manner. I believe it is quite acceptable to choose not to associate with those types of people. I have the choice to deny friendship. I see no problem with sneering at someone who is doing something morally wrong.
See, I don't think it's right to sneer at a whole group of people I don't know and who hurt no one, simply because I don't approve of their work. For someone who in their last post made a boast how they treat women like a gentleman... I guess a woman is only worth treating with respect if they conform to your personal beliefs as to what is an 'acceptable manner'. Otherwise they are fair game to sneer at and show disgust. That is exactly not how a gentleman behaves.
You think I would openly throw insults in public, no. Unlike some people I am respectable in public, I will not resort to use insults to people I don't know. I tell anyone I dont like to simply leave me alone if I don't enjoy their presence. I leave my cynics and remarks in my head usually. You simply think me as unsubtle virulent youth has no comphrehension of social behaviour. They are not forced by any regulation or any law to do the work yet they do it, I have disrepectful thoughts about them but I am not idiotic to flaunt them around like a half-washed drug ridden youth of my generation.
7500pts. 
1750pts. 
1500pts. 
2000pts. 
11000pts.
