Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

*Versailles

But yeah, stynier was clearly trying to threaten IG for going OT. I think its wrong to give a guaranteed lynching just because of that, its a lame excuse for just wanting to vote someone out to get it over with.

Nope, not weird, I am considering offing him myself on account of his ....ness... Only reason he backed off is because he doesn't want to be lynched.

Here's looking at Lord-Loss
So far has had to defend himself against Halo's constant barrage of posts about the same topic over and over and over. Sort of explains why he's had to say the same thing several times. Halo likes to keep poking and poking and prodding...

LL wrote:Stynier, into Drk_Oblit actually does something suspicous, then you should stop this man hunt for him. He's been posting constructively and you dshould forcus on someone who has actually done something suspicous. :/ PAGE7

After your several denunciations of people who are 'leading' the group and saying they're scum, you begin to attack people who aren't voting the way you want people to vote. That looks a lot like leading, or possibly bullying, to me.

LL wrote:Once a Inqusitior announces himself he has literally killed himself, he won't survive another day phase, he has to make sure that he's defintelly got a baddie before annoucning himself.

Not really scummy, but bad advice, especially in this game, as the Inquisitors, if Not_U has kept his plans the same, can nightkill. And sometimes, if the doctor figure is paying attention, giving yourself away isn't a death sentence. Plus, a 1:1 ratio on scum to inquisitor is a bad trade, especially with so many cultists to contend with.

LL wrote:I've been nothing like the DE game, why? Cause I havn't tried establishing myself as the head of the town and I feel alot less involved in this game. Like Fifty, I'm having a hard time getting really "into it" but i'm trying my best.

I agree your playstyle has been different. In the DE game you could hide behind Shas'O but he was flitting and weird. In this game you've got Halo and IG both larking around and distracting all attention from you. If you're evil, you don't need to be so forceful, you can let natural selection take its course.

LL wrote:Fifty, I'm not usualy this argumentive cause i'm not used to be attacked while I do nothing suspicous.

I guess I just don't understand sometimes how you can get so wound up about this. This is Mafia, everything is suspicious to someone. I have my own way of sniffing out bad guys, and it often goes disastrously wrong, which is why most people won't take me seriously any more, but still, I get feelings (not those kind of feelings, pervert) whenever you post. Vibes and whatnot.

So in conclusion... I find you suspicious LL, but I guess I don't have enough to go on right now. You've been doing similar things to me, giving advice and being a little pushy, just in your own style.

Unvote:Lord-Loss

Back to the thread
I'm totally with Stynier. I've never seen a Mafia thread go so off topic, and honestly it's off putting and disrespectful. If I'd been on when the actual offence had been perpetrated I'd have jumped on that 'bandwagon' feeling fully justified, as removing a player that forces me to read all that rubbish is more pro-town than killing a cultist. I come here to play a game and that's what I want to do, not be subjected to that.

I'm not going to vote for IG this time around because I think it would be counter productive, I'd like to see him turn around and start focussing on the game, but I won't hesitate to join any vote against him next time. This thread is for Mafia, personal life can be included sometimes below useful content, but if you're just going to talk rubbish, go elsewhere.

In case I don't get back on before the day ends I'm going to vote now. Halonachos, you've been loud, aggressive and overbearing since day one. The threads fill up with your posts, sometimes several in a row. You're making scum hunting harder than it should be and you're making the thread a chore. I don't know if you're scum or a pro-towner with nothing better to do with your life, but it's got to stop, one way or another.

Vote: Halonachos

@not_u this colour thing is silly. If I promise not to put votes inside my blocks of text, can I leave them as normal colour please?

Yeh, it was really a trial thing. So back to the normal way of voting

So just bold?

OK, by this point we really need a lynch. I'm keeping my vote with GND for the moment, but I'd be okay with an arheiner lynch (what can I say, I'm touchy, though this isn't likely), and unless anybody can convince me otherwise, I'd really prefer sticking with these people.

Inquisitor: I feel like you shouldn't have been that "high" up, but it was just that I only really suspect maybe 3-4 people, and the rest were just the rest, no really true order.

I don't think my Inqusitior advice was bad advice. It's bad to announce yourself as an Inqusitior into Day 2/3 atleast. You need to be sure you got a baddie and got enough evidence to convince the town he's a baddie. Saying that you're an Inqusitior and that you know so and so is a scummy bum only goes so far!

@ Scott and halo, Lan wasn't in danger of being lynched. If he'd had another vote then all of the chaos would have needed to bandwagon onto him, assuming that none of them were already on lan.

I didn't know the full vote count and wasn't planning to change my vote.

Also, I stick with my suspiscions of Lan partly as he and I are nearest to lynch as it would appear others agree wig me on his suspicious nature

Err.... What are your suspicions of Lan? When you voted for him, it was because you were trying to motivate him to not vote No Lynch, and then you said that he was acting like Drk_O "Normally does", although in a different post, you said that Drk_O was "very random but not very scummy".

So you're sticking with your vote for me because you and I have the same amount of votes? And because other people suspect me too?

Hmmm....

The intial bandwagon on Scott and the unreliable nature of you

IGLannister wrote:So you're sticking with your vote for me because you and I have the same amount of votes? And because other people suspect me too?

Hmmm....

If he votes for another person. He will die.

So... what would you do?

Unvote GND

I am still stuck due to the large number of voices all shouting at each other.

I am 100% with Stynier and Gore that IGLannister's posting is inappropriate, unhelpful and unwanted. There is an Off-Topic forum, if you feel the need to post about stuff like that. Repeats will probably see me vote for you. I actually do suspect that the weird posting is a smokescreen for scum-activity. You seem more like Drk_O than Drk_O himself does this game.

Fifty wrote:You seem more like Drk_O than Drk_O himself does this game.

I disagree, I am the greatest me to ever exist!

Bishop, I think you missed my previous post where I apologized for going OT.

Actually GND, the vote count was 3-GND, 3-IG so when synier voted for IG that brought it to 4-IG. This is okay and all, but the day phase is almost over so a full vote wouldn't be necessary as IG would have the most votes when the day phase ended. So yeah, it was almost as good as a death sentence.

Also, by unvoting GND, fifty might as well have voted for IG. You do have reasoning for this though so I don't think its funny at all.

halonachos wrote:Bishop, I think you missed my previous post where I apologized for going OT.

The off topic is not why I'm voting for you. If I were voting for off topic then I'd be voting for IGLannister, since he's the worst perpetrator of that. I'm voting for you because of the way you play the game, which I feel is making it harder to read all the other players. That is the most pro-town move I can see right now.

Well Lan, you've stopped so I can undo this.

UNVOTE IGLannister

Well, currently, it is 2-Lan 3-GND...

My vote is getting nothing done, and IG is a bigger suspect than GND.

UNVOTE-Drk_Oblitr8r

VOTE-IGLannister

Actually I believe it was 2-Lan 2-Gnd. I know for a fact that GND did not have more votes than GND at that point, so by this point IGLannister is getting voted out. Drk_O, Halonachos, Ginger_Nid, and Inquisitor are the people voting for Lannister. Drk_O and Ginger_Nid I see no way of convincing any of you, but Inquisitor, Halonachos, I'm sure that this will probably do badly for my chance to survive, but please don't lynch IGLannister. I feel like he's done so much more than Ginger_Nid_Dude, even if he does have these... relapses in judgement.

I mean, that GND did not have more votes than IGLannister

*Prepares noose around imperial shrine*

So... could we have a last minute count not_u?

So, you're going to go through with this?

I am almost positive that the tally is three and three at this moment.

I feel that lynching GND as opposed to LAN would be a mistake.

Nevermind, I see the unvote for GND now.

Anyway, bye-bye IGLannister...

I feel that while GND isn't doing anything, you're hurting pro-towners.

*Plays world's smallest violin*

I'm relatively positive that the tally is 2 and 2...

If not IGLannister, would you be satisfied with any other lynch?

Yes.

Drk_Oblitr8r

halonachos

BishopGore

VikingScott