Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

This is an automated message added by the articles system.

A new article titled 6th Edition Review: From a ballening standpoint has been added to the dakka articles system.

This message thread is for the discussion of content in the article.

If you have anything to add to the article, then just jump in and edit it by going to the actual article page and clicking 'edit' (the link can be found just above the article). If there is no edit link then the article is locked for now, so just add your comments or content to this thread and if they are appropriate then they should eventually get merged in.

If there is something in the article that you wish to debate or comment on, then this is the place to do it. Just hit the reply button and get chatting! You need to be registered and logged in to post in the forums so if you are an anonymous article editor then now would be a great time to register and join in dakka's great forum discussion!

Check Vector Strike, it is how MC's can assault while flying when I glanced at it. You may need to correct the Flier MC's for that.

I wasn't done with this, but I'll have to consider reading that part of the rules again. I kinda glossed over them and trying to only pick out the biggest changes between 5th and 6th.

Vector strike... I'll have to read that. Make sure I'm not playing it wrong...


Automatically Appended Next Post:
I think the article is finished, unless someone finds I missed something.

I hope you all enjoyed it. I tried to not just think of the good, but also the bad as well. 6th edition looks great, so lets play it right and see what happens.

"Ballencing"
Come on...

Well after a quick google search, ballening (there is no c, at least not this title) is a last name, so maybe its his?

He repeats it with the c in the article. I was going to let the title slide, but title plus spelling it wrong again...

Spelling is a pet peeve - especially with the ease of spellcheck today.

oh, well I didnt read it, just wanted to give him benefit of the doubt, oh well

BewareOfTom wrote:Well after a quick google search, ballening (there is no c, at least not this title) is a last name, so maybe its his?

It's a typo and I can't seem to get it fixed. Apparently once an article is made, you can't change the title? And my poor spell check program apparently doesn't like to work in title boxes. I don't know why... so I didn't even notice the typo till it was too late! GAH!

rigeld2 wrote:He repeats it with the c in the article. I was going to let the title slide, but title plus spelling it wrong again...

Spelling is a pet peeve - especially with the ease of spellcheck today.

Spelling is your Pet Peeve, yet you are spelling Balancing wrong... it's only got one L according to my spell check. And spell check is two words... and spelling is my weakest subject. Seriously. I had to go through special education JUST for spelling...

I wished I could spell better... sorry.

PS: My laptop has a tendency to somehow not register all the key strokes I push, randomly. It just drops a key here and there even though I pushed the key down all the way. Or my mouse pad will click on it's own as I type, making me type in the wrong line. If anyone wants to be my spell checker/typo finder, feel free. And if anyone knows how to fix the title, I'll gladly fix it...

Actually I didn't spell it wrong.
The word was in quotes because I was quoting what you typed.
Not in the article title, but in the first part of the article.

You've since corrected that. Thanks.

rigeld2 wrote:Actually I didn't spell it wrong.
The word was in quotes because I was quoting what you typed.
Not in the article title, but in the first part of the article.

You've since corrected that. Thanks.

Umm... I didn't fix it since you posted. I had that spelled right. The second title in the article, that isn't the article's title. Yeah. Only thing I added in was "(Typo in the title, anyone know how to fix it?)" since you made your comment... So I didn't misspell it in the article, just in the title... or am I getting confused on what you're saying? Or are you getting confused on what I'm saying? Now this is a confusing situation...
Apparently spell check is crazy... I had it check it when I first wrote it, had it spelled myself Balancing, it changed it to Ballancing... and then changed it back to Balancing when I edited it for the typo comment...

I don't get it, but you're right. It did get changed between comments... weird...

I is triple confuseded... (<- Warning: not a real word or proper grammar in any sense of the word.)


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Forgot anyone can change things... new to this article system.


Thanks for fixing my spelling error... it's my weakest subject. Stupid creative spelling... (a stupid program to teach kids how to spell by letting them just spell it as they want and call it right. Messed me up right from the start.)