| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/02 21:29:10
Subject: Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
Blood Angel Neophyte Undergoing Surgeries
|
So, apparently flyers must enter from the reserves and you automatically lose the game if you don't have anything on the board; does this means that i can't use airborne armies anymore? am i forced to send troops on foot/tanks at the beginning of the game? I've finished to make an elysian army last month, and this really pisses me off, since it totally breaks the concept of my army; there is any way to keep an entire army airbone in 6th edition?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/02 21:31:33
Subject: Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
|
If you have no models left on the table at the end of a game turn, then you lose (p122).
So yes, it's a bad idea to have an aircav army now.
Although, since only half of your units can be held in Reserve (not including things that must be held in reserve, like Flyers), there's little chance you'd be able to do so anyway.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/02 21:38:04
Subject: Re:Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
Waaagh! Warbiker
|
There's more to it than that... but in a word, yes.
This is on page 2, take a look...
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/458987.page
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/02 21:44:46
Subject: Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets
|
Crap... this means I can't start Dawn of War like I always do. I hate night fights...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/02 21:45:25
Subject: Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
But with reserve rolls being what a 3+ on turn 3, I think you will be basically rolling really low for this to ever happen.
In other words, nothing to worry about unless your dice rolls 1's all the time.
|
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/02 21:46:30
Subject: Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
Brainy Zoanthrope
Wisconsin
|
SoloFalcon1138 wrote:Crap... this means I can't start Dawn of War like I always do. I hate night fights...
Well, all missions have a chance of being night fighting now.
|
ChrisWWII wrote:I eventually realized that it was apparently one die I had been rolling that kept turning up 3s. My reaction was to take said die, and hurl it out the window of the 3rd floor of our student union. I then placed a Commissar model next to the rest of my dice pile. They immediately began performing much better. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/02 21:47:46
Subject: Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
after reading the link Tactica gave, I see now it's "no models on the board". I missread the rules in the BGB so now I am not sure now.
Guess you will have to put at least one unit on the board.
|
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/02 21:48:16
Subject: Re:Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
Warp-Screaming Noise Marine
|
This sucks for my helghast dropship force
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/02 22:04:44
Subject: Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
Stealthy Kroot Stalker
|
Ditto for my IA8 Elysians. Required an entire rewrite.
I now have a couple squads of forward observers to guide the reserves in on turn 2. There gonna have trouble staying alive though, since cover is only 5+ +1 for a 4+.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/02 22:19:22
Subject: Re:Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
Waaagh! Warbiker
|
Ironically though, an all Drop Pod force would still work... for what that's worth. :/
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/02 22:28:02
Subject: Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
Captain of the Forlorn Hope
|
acekevin8412 wrote:Ditto for my IA8 Elysians. Required an entire rewrite. I now have a couple squads of forward observers to guide the reserves in on turn 2. There gonna have trouble staying alive though, since cover is only 5+ +1 for a 4+.
Find some ruins, or an aegis defense line those both have a 4+cover save built in.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/02 22:28:09
"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.
I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!
We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/02 22:42:54
Subject: Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
SoloFalcon1138 wrote:Crap... this means I can't start Dawn of War like I always do. I hate night fights...
The deployment types aren't the same in 6E.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/02 22:44:21
Subject: Re:Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
Waaagh! Warbiker
|
LOL, true... Dawn of War doesn't exist anymore...
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/02 22:46:23
Subject: Re:Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Tactica wrote:LOL, true... Dawn of War doesn't exist anymore...
Sure it does, it just means something different. (Still not sure why that did that  )
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/02 22:58:27
Subject: Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
To be technically correct, the BEST kind of correct
Aegis defense lines with comm relay. 2+ reserves turn 2, if theyre still alive.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/02 23:38:24
Subject: Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
I share your pain. My all bike list is severely shaken now
|
DO:70S++G++M+B++I+Pw40k93/f#++D++++A++++/eWD-R++++T(D)DM+
Note: Records since 2010, lists kept current (W-D-L) Blue DP Crusade 126-11-6 Biel-Tan Aspect Waves 2-0-2 Looted Green Horde smash your face in 32-7-8 Broadside/Shield Drone/Kroot blitz goodness 23-3-4 Grey Hunters galore 17-5-5 Khan Bikes Win 63-1-1 Tanith with Pardus Armor 11-0-0 Crimson Tide 59-4-0 Green/Raven/Deathwing 18-0-0 Jumping GK force with Inq. 4-0-0 BTemplars w LRs 7-1-2 IH Legion with Automata 8-0-0 RG Legion w Adepticon medal 6-0-0 Primaris and Little Buddies 7-0-0
QM Templates here, HH army builder app for both v1 and v2
One Page 40k Ruleset for Game Beginners |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/03 00:13:37
Subject: Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
"When deploying their armies, players can choose not to deploy up to half their units (rounding up) keeping them as Reserves to arrive later."
R.I.P. Decent of Angels. You were fun while you lasted.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/03 00:36:52
Subject: Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
Stealthy Kroot Stalker
|
kmdl1066 wrote:"When deploying their armies, players can choose not to deploy up to half their units (rounding up) keeping them as Reserves to arrive later."
R.I.P. Decent of Angels. You were fun while you lasted.
Well they can do a hybrid DoA with static gunline on the board, but alas, pure DoA is dead for the most part.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/03 00:47:50
Subject: Re:Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Tactica wrote:Ironically though, an all Drop Pod force would still work... for what that's worth. :/
I do not think that is accurate, but I covered in more detail why in your other thread.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/03 01:31:07
Subject: Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
acekevin8412 wrote:kmdl1066 wrote:"When deploying their armies, players can choose not to deploy up to half their units (rounding up) keeping them as Reserves to arrive later."
R.I.P. Decent of Angels. You were fun while you lasted.
Well they can do a hybrid DoA with static gunline on the board, but alas, pure DoA is dead for the most part.
Jumpers + Devs or rifle dreads was always a more effective army. But pure DoA was more fun.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/03 01:32:53
Subject: Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
Rough Rider with Boomstick
Places
|
Wait , since it says that if you have no units left that should mean that you would be allowed to since in idea you have troops left they just are not deployed
But this may make my Armie some what obsilete which i run a Full Chimera Armie taht includes all mountedd troops , will it still work ? perhaps but who knows
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/03 01:35:13
Motto of the Imperial Guard " If its worth bringing one its worth bringing three"
y
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/03 01:37:35
Subject: Airborne armies auto-lose in 6th edition?
|
 |
The Hammer of Witches
A new day, a new time zone.
|
You should probably crack the rulebook and read the actual rule.
|
"-Nonsense, the Inquisitor and his retinue are our hounoured guests, of course we should invite them to celebrate Four-armed Emperor-day with us..." Thought for the Day - Never use the powerfist hand to wipe. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|