Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Just wondering on what others think of our new missions and deployments? I, for one, love the new deployments, but really do not like either the missions or mysterious objectives (seriously considering house ruling that one away). I am especially liking Vanguard Strike.

I'm not too thrilled about short edge deployment. The core rules have already delayed assaults by 1-2 turns at least, no need to add another 12" of distance.

(ib4 all the gunlineHURRR players come in telling me to "use moar taktix")

lord_blackfang wrote:I'm not too thrilled about short edge deployment. The core rules have already delayed assaults by 1-2 turns at least, no need to add another 12" of distance.

(ib4 all the gunlineHURRR players come in telling me to "use moar taktix")

Use Moar shooty outflanking/deepstriking.

I don't alway play short table edges...


...but when I do I use more taktix.

Love the look of the new missions, still to try them out though.

My only gripe is that they all use the same three secondary missions but I'm sure we'll house rule a few changes sometimes.

Sir Biscuit has an excellent mission @ 3++ is the new black

(on a side note, maybe Kirby should change it to "2+ is the new black")