Switch Theme:

Bolster defences inconsistencies in the FAQs  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Lead-Footed Trukkboy Driver





Birmingham, UK

Grey Knights and Blood Angels have had their version of bolster defences buffed to mean that it can work with ANYpiece of terrain (except fortification bought as part of army list), whereas Vanilla marines are stuck with only bolstering ruins - whats that about? I'v been impressed so far with 6th trying to be consistent but this isn't.

Please tell me I 've missed something

   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut





There are supposed to be small inconsistencies. Maybe the GK one costs a little more? I don't have the rulebooks on me atm.

Unnessesarily extravegant word of the week award goes to jcress410 for this:

jcress wrote:Seem super off topic to complain about epistemology on a thread about tactics.
 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: