| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2012/07/08 18:42:54
Subject: Can we Expect a 6th Errata or a New Round of FAQs?
|
|
Savage Khorne Berserker Biker
|
Just curious. You guys think there will be some clearing up of rules and issues of the new edition anytime soon, based on your experience with the previous edition changes?
Also, (and this may be me hoping against hope here), maybe a second round of codex FAQs?
|
In Boxing matches, you actually get paid to take a dive and make the other guy look good.
In Warhammer 40K, you're expected to pay cash out of your pocket for the privilege of having Marines and IG trample all over your Xenos/Chaos. |
|
|
 |
|
2012/07/08 18:54:08
Subject: Can we Expect a 6th Errata or a New Round of FAQs?
|
|
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
|
I could see them coming up in another month or so, or at least once a new codex has been released.
|
Check out my Youtube channel!
 |
|
|
|
|
2012/07/08 19:09:47
Subject: Re:Can we Expect a 6th Errata or a New Round of FAQs?
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
Why would they even be necessary at this point?
|
"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."
This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.
Freelance Ontologist
When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. |
|
|
|
|
2012/07/08 19:10:00
Subject: Can we Expect a 6th Errata or a New Round of FAQs?
|
|
[DCM]
Tilter at Windmills
|
Updated codex FAQs are quite possible, as there are some items which were definitely overlooked the first time around. People sending in clear and organized emails covering stuff like Fuegan's Fire Axe will help.
A main rulebook FAQ is guaranteed; will probably be a month or two, once they accrue a good number of questions and sort them out.
|
Adepticon 2015: Team Tourney Best Imperial Team- Team Ironguts, Adepticon 2014: Team Tourney 6th/120, Best Imperial Team- Cold Steel Mercs 2, 40k Championship Qualifier ~25/226
More 2010-2014 GT/Major RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 78-20-9 // SW: 8-1-2 (Golden Ticket with SW), BA: 29-9-4 6th Ed GT & RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 36-12-2 // BA: 11-4-1 // SW: 1-1-1
DT:70S++++G(FAQ)M++B++I+Pw40k99#+D+++A+++/sWD105R+++T(T)DM+++++
A better way to score Sportsmanship in tournaments
The 40K Rulebook & Codex FAQs. You should have these bookmarked if you play this game.
The Dakka Dakka Forum Rules You agreed to abide by these when you signed up.
Maelstrom's Edge! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
