Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I recently purchased the warhammer forge nurgle ogres but as I'm not running them in any actual lists was thinking of using them as beasts of nurgle in a 40k army, beasts of nurgle are the only thing that i can fathom that they even remotely could resemble, would anyone have a problem with this being used against them?

Well seeing as beasts of nurgle are often varied and sometimes so different that you can never be sure what it is.

I wouldn't feel off facing one.

No problems here....

but then again ive played 3000pt battles were the majority of the models are lego men, various other toys and paper cut out bases.

Don't get me started on the lolly jar monoliths.

So when it comes to could as, i'm pretty easy. So long as i can remember what it is.... and if i can't; usually i get them to write it on a bit of paper next to them lol.

So yeah, but i don't think anyone will have a problem with this.

Perfect Cheers

No! I won't let you use cool and fitting models to represent units in your army!

Go for it They're appropriately sized for a counts-as, and while I don't know the Beast stats off the top of my head, I'm sure they're not too far off.