| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/29 06:07:58
Subject: C'tan shards unoriginal?
|
 |
Frightening Flamer of Tzeentch
|
Soo i was thinking the eldar and necrons are hated enemies yet the c'tan shards to me just seem like they kinda copied how khaine was split into a bunch of pieces?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/29 08:49:19
Subject: C'tan shards unoriginal?
|
 |
Grisly Ghost Ark Driver
|
Sorta different...
Khaine: Destroyed when running from Slannesh into the real world, his/its form was instantly shattered into pieces.
C'tan Shards: merciless forces of nature which betrayed the Necrontyr and were utterly obliterated in a revenge ploy by those necrons and they're huuuge firepower post war in heaven. Buuut you can't really destroy a c'tan, so they pumped them full of guass so hard they began to break apart and those weaker shards were trapped.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/29 09:23:28
Subject: C'tan shards unoriginal?
|
 |
Frightening Flamer of Tzeentch
|
yeah i guess but i dunno it just seemed to me like they dindt put a whole lot of thought into it.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/29 09:30:28
Subject: C'tan shards unoriginal?
|
 |
Contagious Dreadnought of Nurgle
|
lets face it. the Terminators... er...i mean the Necrons as they were first written were not all that original.
|
Pestilence Provides. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/29 09:43:38
Subject: C'tan shards unoriginal?
|
 |
Frightening Flamer of Tzeentch
|
haha truee.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/29 10:28:53
Subject: C'tan shards unoriginal?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
sennacherib wrote:lets face it. the Terminators... er...i mean the Necrons as they were first written were not all that original.
Agreed. I personally believe the changes in their new Codex were needed to make them a more characterful and customisable force; diversifying their race and really providing the player with opportunities for customisation and personalisation.
It really helps the Necrons overall as a collectible force IMHO.
It wasn't perfectly done, I would've preferred they moved away from the Tomb Kings side and made them more grimdark, but I feel for the large part it was a good and required change.
Then again, the Tyranids get away with a relative lack of customisation or character, but that could arguably only serve to make the oldcrons less original... Is the galaxy large enough for multiple genocidal races?
I also love the idea of the Necrons uprising and defeating gods. I probably would've preferred it had they not gone down the shards route, but I love the idea of gods being destroyed like that, particularly in a universe where gods are so powerful.
|
Enlist as a virtual Ultramarine! Click here for my Chaos Gate (PC) thread.
"It is the great irony of the Legiones Astartes: engineered to kill to achieve a victory of peace that they can then be no part of."
- Roboute Guilliman
"As I recall, your face was tortured. Imagine that - the Master of the Wolves, his ferocity twisted into grief. And yet you still carried out your duty. You always did what was asked of you. So loyal. So tenacious. Truly you were the attack dog of the Emperor. You took no pleasure in what you did. I knew that then, and I know it now. But all things change, my brother. I'm not the same as I was, and you're... well, let us not mention where you are now."
- Magnus the Red, to a statue of Leman Russ
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/29 12:08:03
Subject: C'tan shards unoriginal?
|
 |
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
As has already been observed, the C'tan shards are the least of the off-brand Terminators' originality problems.
|
Red Hunters: 2000 points Grey Knights: 2000 points Black Legion: 600 points and counting |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/29 15:41:27
Subject: C'tan shards unoriginal?
|
 |
Fate-Controlling Farseer
|
IronfrontAlex wrote:Sorta different...
Khaine: Destroyed when running from Slannesh into the real world, his/its form was instantly shattered into pieces.
C'tan Shards: merciless forces of nature which betrayed the Necrontyr and were utterly obliterated in a revenge ploy by those necrons and they're huuuge firepower post war in heaven. Buuut you can't really destroy a c'tan, so they pumped them full of guass so hard they began to break apart and those weaker shards were trapped.
Heh... hate on the Eldar much? Khaine was defeated by Slaanesh and enslaved. Khorne, being the Chaos god of war, claimed Khaine for himself. The battle between the two is what shattered Khaine's body. Not him "running away".
|
Full Frontal Nerdity |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/29 16:11:52
Subject: Re:C'tan shards unoriginal?
|
 |
Perturbed Blood Angel Tactical Marine
|
I choose you! Void Dragon!
Void Dragon used Power of the Omnissia.
Matt Ward used Retcon. It was super effective! Void Dragon fainted.
What's this? Matt Ward is evolving!
Congratulations! Matt Ward has evolved into GW President! Matt Ward has learned Necronbrofist.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/29 16:27:42
Subject: Re:C'tan shards unoriginal?
|
 |
Stormin' Stompa
|
jadebullet wrote:I choose you! Void Dragon!
Void Dragon used Power of the Omnissia.
Matt Ward used Retcon. It was super effective! Void Dragon fainted.
What's this? Matt Ward is evolving!
Congratulations! Matt Ward has evolved into GW President! Matt Ward has learned Necronbrofist.
I thought the void dragon was still part of the background, it's just a loose shard now.
|
Ask yourself: have you rated a gallery image today? |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/29 16:35:21
Subject: C'tan shards unoriginal?
|
 |
Pyro Pilot of a Triach Stalker
|
It's not "loose" it is bound on Mars or a shard of it is.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/29 18:05:06
Subject: Re:C'tan shards unoriginal?
|
 |
Grisly Ghost Ark Driver
|
jadebullet wrote:I choose you! Void Dragon!
Void Dragon used Power of the Omnissia.
Matt Ward used Retcon. It was super effective! Void Dragon fainted.
What's this? Matt Ward is evolving!
Congratulations! Matt Ward has evolved into GW President! Matt Ward has learned Necronbrofist.
OMG im dying right now bwahahha
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/30 23:13:40
Subject: C'tan shards unoriginal?
|
 |
Raging Ravener
Alaska
|
Now that you mention it, C'tan shards aren't too different from Poke-balls...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/31 04:37:01
Subject: C'tan shards unoriginal?
|
 |
Daemonic Dreadnought
|
There are reasons why I ignore the fluff and made my own... I'll agree that the fluff needed tweaking but Ward did a terrible job.
|
Gods? There are no gods. Merely existences, obstacles to overcome.
"And what if I told you the Wolves tried to bring a Legion to heel once before? What if that Legion sent Russ and his dogs running, too ashamed to write down their defeat in Imperial archives?" - ADB |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/31 04:50:52
Subject: Re:C'tan shards unoriginal?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I love the new necron fluff and the c'tan shards being in the present timeline makes more sense. Before the retcon the full nightbringer and deceiver were as powerful as greater daemons. they were starved but still they were whole. So the retcon actually makes the c;tans more powerful with the emperor only defeating a shard of the void dragon and all. And now the Necrons have even more ancient high tech artifacts and weapons of galactic destruction, making them more mysterious, ancient. and deadly.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/31 04:52:12
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/31 06:04:47
Subject: C'tan shards unoriginal?
|
 |
Frightening Flamer of Tzeentch
|
atleast we know that if the necron race were tp be driven to extinction they could kill everyone else with them using the celestial orrery!
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|