| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2012/08/01 07:37:41
Subject: ATSKNF 6th
|
|
Raging Ravener
|
Quick question, does the defention of ATSKNF in the 6th rule book override the one in the codex? Its all the same expect one USR listed at the end of the defention in the codex that is not there in the rulebook.
|
BURN THE HERETIC! KILL THE MUTANT! PURGE THE UNCLEAN! |
|
|
 |
|
2012/08/01 07:40:52
Subject: ATSKNF 6th
|
|
Captain of the Forlorn Hope
|
Check the FAQ.
The BA FAQ states that the 6th ed rules trump the ATSKNF rules in the BA codex.
I would imagine it is the same for the other marine books.
|
"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.
I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!
We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
|
|
|
|
|
2012/08/01 09:36:53
Subject: Re:ATSKNF 6th
|
|
Lead-Footed Trukkboy Driver
|
Players at my local gaming group had an issue with the the new ATSKNF.
When the space marines automatically regroup do they count as moving? or can they fire their weapons as if they were stationary. BRB says they can fire their weapons "normally". does this mean normally (counting as moved if they did), normally (counting as stationary) or normally (counting as moving whether they did or not).
I know in 5th they counted as stationary, but we couldn't agree on RAW in 6th.
Please help dakka
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012/08/01 13:14:41
Subject: Re:ATSKNF 6th
|
|
Chalice-Wielding Sanguinary High Priest
|
I've checked this for BA, C:SM and GK and can say that the FAQs all state to replace ATSKNF with the version of the BRB.
Kapitan, as for your question - I'll look this up when I have the book, but I believe it's still covered either within there or within the FAQs that the regroup move doesn't qualify as a normal move, so they still count as stationary.
|
 "Hard pressed on my right. My centre is yielding. Impossible to manoeuvre. Situation excellent. I am attacking." - General Ferdinand Foch |
|
|
|
|
2012/08/01 13:39:39
Subject: ATSKNF 6th
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I believe the BRB says that you rally/regroup "..before the unit moves." So that would mean they do not count as having moved since the rally(including the 3" move) happens "before" movement.
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/08/01 13:42:41
|
|
|
|
|
2012/08/01 13:54:58
Subject: ATSKNF 6th
|
|
Land Raider Pilot on Cruise Control
|
40k-noob wrote:I believe the BRB says that you rally/regroup "..before the unit moves." So that would mean they do not count as having moved since the rally(including the 3" move) happens "before" movement.
Yes, since they can move as normal they can choose not to move, as normal. Which means if they don't move they didn't move.
|
|
|
|
|
2012/08/01 17:52:54
Subject: ATSKNF 6th
|
|
Raging Ravener
|
Thanks all! Sorry if it had been asked prior on here. I tried a search with no luck but didn't search the FAQS like a good boy :/
|
BURN THE HERETIC! KILL THE MUTANT! PURGE THE UNCLEAN! |
|
|
|
|
2012/08/10 23:20:55
Subject: Re:ATSKNF 6th
|
|
Jovial Junkatrukk Driver
|
I read somewhere that if there is conflict beetwen rulebook and codex special rules the one in the codex takes precedence. But if the faq states otherwise then i suppose you should follow what it says.
|
motyak wrote:[...] Yes, the mods are illuminati, and yakface, lego and dakka dakka itself are the 3 points of the triangle.
|
|
|
|
|
2012/08/11 01:21:13
Subject: Re:ATSKNF 6th
|
|
Powerful Phoenix Lord
|
Daemonhammer wrote:I read somewhere that if there is conflict beetwen rulebook and codex special rules the one in the codex takes precedence. But if the faq states otherwise then i suppose you should follow what it says.
No conflict here. All of the SM FAQs say to ignore ATSKNF from the codex and use the BRB version instead.
|
Greebo had spent an irritating two minutes in that box. Technically, a cat locked in a box may be alive or it may be dead. You never know until you look. In fact, the mere act of opening the box will determine the state of the cat, although in this case there were three determinate states the cat could be in: these being Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
Orks always ride in single file to hide their strength and numbers.
Gozer the Gozerian, Gozer the Destructor, Volguus Zildrohar, Gozer the Traveler, and Lord of the Sebouillia |
|
|
|
|
2012/08/11 01:31:14
Subject: Re:ATSKNF 6th
|
|
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard
|
Happyjew wrote:Daemonhammer wrote:I read somewhere that if there is conflict beetwen rulebook and codex special rules the one in the codex takes precedence. But if the faq states otherwise then i suppose you should follow what it says.
No conflict here. All of the SM FAQs say to ignore ATSKNF from the codex and use the BRB version instead.
Happy is right but some people have been using this FAQ referencing BRB to go mental on the hierarchy of FAQ>codex>brb.
If the FAQ says to look at the brb then the ultimate voice says to use the BRB rules in this limited area.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
