| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/06 15:47:13
Subject: Alternatives to GW's crusaders?
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
The title says it all really, they only made 2 models and I need around 12 of the buggers...
|
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/06 16:03:12
Subject: Re:Alternatives to GW's crusaders?
|
 |
Pete Haines
Nottingham
|
Here's the best example I've seen, though not sold on the cadian heads.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/06 16:09:45
Subject: Alternatives to GW's crusaders?
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Brettonian Men at Arms have a great set of bits.
I hope those aren't supposed to be counting as DCA (the Repentia). That's not a very representative model with only one weapon and it is a chainsword/eviscerator and not a PW.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/06 16:29:03
Subject: Re:Alternatives to GW's crusaders?
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
Probably counting as banishers? Those Chaos Warriors had crossed my mind, but I'm not so fond of the sheer bulk of them, or the furry cloaks. The Men-At-Arms are also a good idea, and I may consider them. Otherwise, keep those ideas coming!
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/08/06 16:31:06
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/06 16:29:53
Subject: Alternatives to GW's crusaders?
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Ooh, good call. Yeah, that would be a good counts-as.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/06 16:35:22
Subject: Re:Alternatives to GW's crusaders?
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
Also, where are those swords from? PAGKs?
|
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/06 21:11:36
Subject: Re:Alternatives to GW's crusaders?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/08/06 21:14:26
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/06 21:40:53
Subject: Re:Alternatives to GW's crusaders?
|
 |
Purposeful Hammerhead Pilot
|
Check the protectorate of menoth range, one of their knights units fits crusaders perfectly im sure
http://privateerpress.com/warmachine/gallery/the-protectorate-of-menoth/units/exemplar-errants-plastic
What about those?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/08/06 21:42:39
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/07 12:49:36
Subject: Re:Alternatives to GW's crusaders?
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
Kroot, those look ace! Are they 28mm scale? Not familiar with Infinity...
|
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/07 20:04:36
Subject: Re:Alternatives to GW's crusaders?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
More or less, maybe a tad taller and with realistic proportions, but nothing that would look out of place.
On the photo left Infinity, right GW.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 01:39:30
Subject: Alternatives to GW's crusaders?
|
 |
Hallowed Canoness
|
I just picked up a lady paladin from Hasslefree miniatures for use as a Crusader conversion, honestly any "Crusader" mini will do the job, it's all knights with big swords and shields, add some iconography, some purity seals and you're golden!
|
I beg of you sarge let me lead the charge when the battle lines are drawn
Lemme at least leave a good hoof beat they'll remember loud and long
SoB, IG, SM, SW, Nec, Cus, Tau, FoW Germans, Team Yankee Marines, Battletech Clan Wolf, Mercs
DR:90-SG+M+B+I+Pw40k12+ID+++A+++/are/WD-R+++T(S)DM+ |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|