Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/11 02:43:13
Subject: Multiple Combat Challenge Curfufle
|
 |
Guarding Guardian
|
hi there
I had a weird challenge situation the other day with a friend of mine, I was playing Eldar, he was playing Grey Knights.
his dreadknight issued a challenge to Yriel, who was involved in a combat with purifiers, paladins, Striking Scorpions, and Dire Avengers.
the dreadknight was in base to base with Yriel, but also with two dire avengers who were within unit coherency with the exarch. I said
"okay my exarch accepts the challenge since I have the last say"
my friend stated that "since Yriel isn't attached to a squad, he's his own unit and he can't refuse my challenge to him"
and proceeded to take Yriel out of the combat. I argued that you can't target a specific model, just the enemy at large and see who advances like it says
in the rule book, but it doesn't clarify what that means for multiple combats.
This ended up costing me the game as Yriel was busy fighting the dreadknight and the rest of the grey knight units over whelmed my
dire avenger squad and Striking Scorpion exarch so he couldn't kill the enemy units like he should have.
Is this a legal movement, or is it a misinterpretation of the rules?
Any help would be very appreciated
have a good one!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/11 02:46:53
Subject: Multiple Combat Challenge Curfufle
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I do believe a dreadknights is not a character and there for cant issue a challage. But could be wtong
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/11 03:03:09
Subject: Multiple Combat Challenge Curfufle
|
 |
[MOD]
Not as Good as a Minion
|
Steel Angel wrote:I do believe a dreadknights is not a character and there for cant issue a challage. But could be wtong
Pretty sure they are. But I'm not sure on the actual OP, sorry.
|
I wish I had time for all the game systems I own, let alone want to own... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/11 23:55:45
Subject: Multiple Combat Challenge Curfufle
|
 |
Raging Ravener
|
Units that consist of single characters cannot refuse challenges. Even though Yriel was involved in a multiple combat, if he had not joined another unit then what your opponent did was fine.
|
More than 7pts, less than 7000...just
4000+ 2500 2000+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/12 00:32:27
Subject: Multiple Combat Challenge Curfufle
|
 |
Steadfast Grey Hunter
|
boggy is correct, if he did not join with one of your other eldar squads, he CAN be singled out as he is a unit of one. Now for example if he was in the squad of avengers, he would have to issue the challenge to the avenger squad if he was wanting to fight Yriel (of course you could accept with him or the exarch).
Concerning the Dreadknight, I dont know whether he is a character or not. I would think he would be, but if not he couldnt have issue the challenge.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/12 20:13:15
Subject: Multiple Combat Challenge Curfufle
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/12 20:33:28
Subject: Multiple Combat Challenge Curfufle
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I do not know Eldar units, but if the Dreadknight was in BTB with 2 different units, then any char from either unit could accept his challenge. He cannot target a challenge (pg. 64 Accepting a challenge) and you have final say of who gets to accept.
Challenge rules do not really address multi-unit close combats really well.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/12 21:55:46
Subject: Multiple Combat Challenge Curfufle
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
It is one multiple combat
Any person involved in the combat that is eligible can accept the challenge
This isnt Yriel refusing,t his is an exarch accepting.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/12 22:04:37
Subject: Re:Multiple Combat Challenge Curfufle
|
 |
Irked Necron Immortal
|
Id also like to point out that Yuriel was within Coherency of a unit when you moved him into that combat, you would have had to have chosen a squadron that he was attached to at that point.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/12 22:15:18
Subject: Multiple Combat Challenge Curfufle
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
As stated, you never challenge a model, only make a challenge.
The player who did not challenge can either accept with any character engaged in the combat, or refuse and the challenger decides who is moved to the back.
Any character engaged in the combat could accept the challenge, no matter where they were. So the Scorpion Exarch could also have accepted, if there was one.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/08/12 22:15:39
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/12 22:39:51
Subject: Re:Multiple Combat Challenge Curfufle
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Xzerios wrote:Id also like to point out that Yuriel was within Coherency of a unit when you moved him into that combat, you would have had to have chosen a squadron that he was attached to at that point.
Not true, unless you have a rule allowing you to join units outside of the movement phase?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/12 22:54:12
Subject: Multiple Combat Challenge Curfufle
|
 |
Raging Ravener
|
nosferatu1001 wrote:It is one multiple combat
Any person involved in the combat that is eligible can accept the challenge
This isnt Yriel refusing,t his is an exarch accepting.
Very good point. I was thinking of it as issuing a challenge to a unit, not the combat as a whole. Not sure which way I'd call this now.....
|
More than 7pts, less than 7000...just
4000+ 2500 2000+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/12 22:55:18
Subject: Multiple Combat Challenge Curfufle
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
You issue a challenge to the enemy side in the combat
You dont issue it TO a model, but the enemy "side", however many units that may be
There is no call to be made, the rules are clear on this.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/12 22:57:12
Subject: Multiple Combat Challenge Curfufle
|
 |
Powerful Phoenix Lord
|
You can verbally challenge a specific model, however that model does not necessarily have to be the one to accept the challenge. So where Chapter Master Bob is bad-mouthing Steve the Warboss' Momma, it could be that Joe the Nob is the one who steps up to the challenge.
|
Greebo had spent an irritating two minutes in that box. Technically, a cat locked in a box may be alive or it may be dead. You never know until you look. In fact, the mere act of opening the box will determine the state of the cat, although in this case there were three determinate states the cat could be in: these being Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
Orks always ride in single file to hide their strength and numbers.
Gozer the Gozerian, Gozer the Destructor, Volguus Zildrohar, Gozer the Traveler, and Lord of the Sebouillia |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/12 23:18:28
Subject: Multiple Combat Challenge Curfufle
|
 |
Apprehensive Inquisitorial Apprentice
The Netherlands
|
As long as there was another character in the unit on the Eldar side you could have elected to have that character accept the challenge (since you can choose any character within the combat to accept the challenge).
However if there was no other character on the Eldar side and jYriel was not attached to another unit, he would have been forced to accept the challenge as he would be a unit of one (who can not refuse a challenge as your opponent mentioned).
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/13 03:45:36
Subject: Re:Multiple Combat Challenge Curfufle
|
 |
Guarding Guardian
|
hello!
first off, thanks to everyone for your answers and clarifications!
I'm gonna go with the majority and rule that you can challenge the combat at large as
that makes more sense to me than being able to target something specific.
and to clarify with Xzerios, I made it clear with my opponent that Yriel was on his own before I made the charge as he had left the Striking
Scorpion squad before charging so he could use his Fleet Of Foot rerolls for his charging distance, the only place
he could charge where nobody was in base contact with my opponent's units was in between the 3 scorpions and 9 DAs.
by in coherency I mean he was right next to the DA squad, and was in base contact with one of the dire avengers.
he couldn't in the squad as it was in the assault phase. I hope that cleared any confusion up
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/15 16:28:39
Subject: Multiple Combat Challenge Curfufle
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Ok the Nemisis Dreadknight is a character. However when the NDK charged in and was in base with two separate units he (the eldar) player has the right to accept with either unit in base contact so yes you could have accepted with the exarch and continued fighting with uriel... Just as intended.
|
In a dog eat dog be a cat. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/15 17:56:45
Subject: Multiple Combat Challenge Curfufle
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
An NDK cannot charge in and base two separate units, as the first model to be moved MUST move against the primary.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/15 17:58:41
Subject: Multiple Combat Challenge Curfufle
|
 |
The Hive Mind
|
nosferatu1001 wrote:An NDK cannot charge in and base two separate units, as the first model to be moved MUST move against the primary.
They could, it'd just be really hard.
2 units, offset slightly. Only angle of approach for the farther unit is to be in base to the closer one. Declare charge on the farther unit. Base both.
|
My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/15 18:09:11
Subject: Multiple Combat Challenge Curfufle
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
As per page 28, you are only given permission to charge into the Primary unit, meaning the shortest route cannot include basing any other unit
If this is the only route open, the charge must fail as there is no possible route that follows all the rules.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/15 18:12:35
Subject: Multiple Combat Challenge Curfufle
|
 |
The Hive Mind
|
nosferatu1001 wrote:As per page 28, you are only given permission to charge into the Primary unit, meaning the shortest route cannot include basing any other unit
If this is the only route open, the charge must fail as there is no possible route that follows all the rules.
Actually, that phrase doesn't disallow it. Rereading it however shows "remaining models" can charge the secondary units, which means you're right, but not the way you thought you were.
|
My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals. |
|
 |
 |
|