| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2012/08/16 00:32:53
Subject: Multi-combat and challenges
|
|
Pyro Pilot of a Triach Stalker
|
A situation came up at our club a few weeks ago. Basic need to know information was that one side of the combat was Blood Angels and contained both Mephiston and an assault squad with multiple characters. The question was could the opposing player challenge a specific Blood Angel 'unit' involved in the combat? Specifically could he challenge the non-Mephiston unit, and that unit only could respond to the challenge? Or could the Blood Angel player choose to always accept the Challenge with Mephiston? Vice, Versa could a player choose to nominate Mephiston's unit for a challenge(one he therefore must accept as he is a single model unit and cannot refuse)?
|
|
|
 |
|
2012/08/16 00:36:17
Subject: Multi-combat and challenges
|
|
The Hive Mind
|
|
My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals.
|
|
|
|
|
2012/08/16 01:13:59
Subject: Multi-combat and challenges
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
rigeld2 wrote:http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/469126.page
That doesn't really answer it.
|
Unnessesarily extravegant word of the week award goes to jcress410 for this:
jcress wrote:Seem super off topic to complain about epistemology on a thread about tactics.
|
|
|
|
|
2012/08/16 01:34:51
Subject: Multi-combat and challenges
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
No, you do not target units or characters with challenges
|
|
|
|
|
2012/08/16 02:07:59
Subject: Re:Multi-combat and challenges
|
|
Pyro Pilot of a Triach Stalker
|
What about the fact that Mephiston can't refuse the challenge? He is still a single model unit, and cannot refuse challenges issued.
|
|
|
|
|
2012/08/16 02:12:00
Subject: Re:Multi-combat and challenges
|
|
Preacher of the Emperor
|
NecronLord3 wrote:What about the fact that Mephiston can't refuse the challenge? He is still a single model unit, and cannot refuse challenges issued.
He is not refusing in this case. There are multiple models eligible to accept the challenge and so the controlling player can choose any eligible model to accept.
|
|
|
|
|
2012/08/16 04:12:46
Subject: Multi-combat and challenges
|
|
The Hive Mind
|
Testify wrote:rigeld2 wrote:http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/469126.page
That doesn't really answer it.
It's the exact same situation. Different codexes but the exact same thing.
|
My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals.
|
|
|
|
|
2012/08/17 11:12:37
Subject: Multi-combat and challenges
|
|
Iron Fang
|
Panzer's got it right. Challenges can't be issued to individual models, only sides. So if your opponent challenges you, you can then accept with any character in the combat. Mephiston's rule comes into play only if he's the only character in the combat
|
Khador |
|
|
|
|
|
|
