To Boldly Flee or to boldly be in trouble with GW?

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Grimtuff**

Charax wrote:
Oh, and copyright covers expression, not ideas - so the Vyper model TGWTG are using is copyright of whoever made it, whereas GW hold the copyright to the model of the vyper, that being the physical expression of the idea of a Vyper. Two different media, two different copyrights, Q.E.D. transformative work.

All of which is largely irrelevant because nothing's going to happen. GW aren't going to waste money pursuing it, and TGWTG aren't going to remove it this late in production. Nothing changes, status quo is god

Exactly, remember the time GW went after Disturbed for their "Land of Confusion" video? Oh wait...

**Grimtuff**

Charax wrote:
adamsouza wrote:GW would have to high to have gone after Disturbed for this. It's an awesome video that gave me ideas on how to paint a new Imperial Guard Army, but I don't think GW owns "Angry Mobs", "Nazis with gas masks", or "Rich Uncle Pennybags"

No, but I'm pretty damn sure they own the Sabre 20 seconds in (Rhino with a big gun, which is about as different as TGWTG's Vyper without a platform)

Cheers for the catch there. I'm glad at least you knew what I was pointing out.