Switch Theme:

BA and DA combined codex?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Perturbed Blood Angel Tactical Marine




I was just reading a thread on WarSeer about a BA and DA combined codex called the Angels of Death. What do you guys all think about a codex that after taking a BA/DA HQ it unlocks specific units from that side of the codex but you are still allowed to take some units from both sides of the codex?

If anyone's interested, here's the thread: http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?200429-Should-Blood-Angels-and-Dark-Angels-be-rolled-into-a-single-Codex-Angels-of-Death
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





I've never been opposed to one book to make all the varying Chapter's of space marines myself (most objections come from Space Wolf and Black Templar proponents), but that's not what Angels of Death was, it was just two army books in one, no crossover units (other then things like tactical marines being mostly identical).

That said, I'm not sure its very likely anymore, unless we really do see the end of the "wave in support of codex" model release schedule.

Jack



The rules:
1) Style over Substance.
2) Attitude is Everything.
3) Always take it to the Edge.
4) Break the Rules. 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Proposed Rules
Go to: