| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/01 12:00:07
Subject: Dawnblade and tanks
|
 |
Warplord Titan Princeps of Tzeentch
|
The wording on the dawnblade had me a bit confused lately.
While I was sure it meant that you "roll" 2d6+5, and then add another 5 for strength normally effectivly being "2d6+10" unless something somehow increase his strength further, sombody else claimed its just "2d6+5", with the 5 from the strength already included.
What is the currect answer?
|
can neither confirm nor deny I lost track of what I've got right now. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/01 12:12:23
Subject: Dawnblade and tanks
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
2D6+5, instead of D6+5
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/01 13:53:21
Subject: Re:Dawnblade and tanks
|
 |
Grisly Ghost Ark Driver
|
Yep, his strength is included in the weapons' statline so essentially what the dawnblade does is add an additional 'd6' to your penetration roll.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/01 16:24:28
Subject: Re:Dawnblade and tanks
|
 |
Warplord Titan Princeps of Tzeentch
|
Not as much of a can opener as I thought then...
Still not bad at it, but not dreadnaut's envy.
|
can neither confirm nor deny I lost track of what I've got right now. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/01 17:07:36
Subject: Re:Dawnblade and tanks
|
 |
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
BoomWolf wrote:Not as much of a can opener as I thought then...
Still not bad at it, but not dreadnaut's envy.
Same as the old Warscythe. Not bad at all; you'll glance AV 12 on an average roll.
|
Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|