Switch Theme:

Imotekh's lightning Vs flyers  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Irked Necron Immortal





Washington, USA

As written; TftD, Sweep Attacks, and even bomb squigs should be able to hit flyers. That's a tenuous "should" with many dissenters of course, the most important one being GW itself. Never mind that Hard to Hit only mentions Shots. As was said earlier:

foolishmortal wrote:

I don't want a faq entry on LotS. I want errata on Hard to Hit. Don't ask GW to mop up the floor. Ask them to fix the roof.


Until such a time as this happens, every special rule in the books is going to spawn an argument somewhere in the world.
My feelings on LotS is that techno-lightening should be able to down aircraft in fiery glory. We'll see what GW has to say on that soon, I hope.
Perhaps we can take tacit approval in that GW hasn't said LotS can't hit flyers. They've taken time to mention a lot of other contenders...

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/10/10 06:35:38


 
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: