Seeing as she's been to conventions in similar costumes and never been harassed or degraded like this before, yes, this is beyond the normal boundries of the social standard that's relevant.
Remove her wig and mask, and change her costume slightly but she's still wearing a skin tight leather outfit. Insert her into your local bar, club, party whatever. Would ANYONE say forward and dumb questions wouldnt happen? OF course they would. But gak like this happens every weekend ad nauseaum at bars, and no one blinks an eye. You might say alcohol is to blame for poor behavior at bars, but every con ive been to has been a big party. Why is this news then?
And if we sent her back in time, she could be burnt as a witch, or if we dropped her into a Taliban stronghold I'm sure much worse than this would happen to her.
But seeing as none of that happened, nor is she in a bar, in a different outfit, that doesn't matter.
And it's telling the sole arguments that don't largely consist of yelling "whore " at her only consist entirely of rewriting entirely new and fictitious scenarios, which bear minimal to no relevance to the case in hand.
Im not talking about nerd persecution. But as I understand it, the Daily Mail is almost a tabloid correct? So its safe to assume that most its readers are probably not the most discerning type correct? So if thats the case, then a quick glance over this article will lead many to think "well cons ARE full of the weirdos I always heard they were" Or is that wrong?
.. think print version of Fox News.
And people need to get off this bs that anyone is "slut-shaming" her. Were simply asking how this rude and crass, but overall insignificant behavior is making national news. Some of you think she's out there standing up for womens rights. Others think shes blowing something out of proportion to garner hits on her website and the Daily Mail to sell copies. Only she knows the truth. Not you. Not I.
So please stop comparing anyone that isnt instantly supporting her to rapists and wife beaters.
seeing as she's been described over and over in this thread as " whore" or slut methinks you doth protest too much.
She didn't blow anything out of proportion. The Daily Mail article is nothing to do with her, her article was originally referenced on a website that deals mainly with comic books, and from there the magic of the web did it's wonderful work.
How is a women wearing what she wants and then writing what she wants not standing up for women's right s? We've got posters in this very thread saying she's now rite to do X/Y/Z, when she quite blatantly does.