Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
So I was thinking about taking Karandras for his CC prowess and I have had several Dakkites claim that Fuegan is a better choice. Is Fuegan's 4 I7 S5 attacks that ignore armour saves better than Karandras' 6 I1 S8 attacks that ignore armour saves? Coming from Orks, I have characters with Power Klaws and no Eternal Warrior, so going at I1 doesn't seem like that much of a detriment to me. Or is there something else I am missing?
I don't write the rules. My ego just lives and dies by them one model at a time.
Kandras gives stealth to a unit, which is huge. If he needs to, he can use his scorpion chainsword for S5 attacks at I7. Karandras is less likely to survive in a knock down drag out, and is far worse against tanks. He sticks more wounds against tough targets though with more attacks.
Both give fearless to the unit they join. Both have amazing stats. Fuegan is 10 points cheaper. Unless you are exploiting the stealth USR with Karandras I would say Fuegan is better.
Either way, they are the two playable PL's in the codex.
The most important rule of 40K-Page XVII of the 6th edition rulebook, the figure at the top right of the page. "Shake hands with your opponent and thank them for a good battle and fun experience." Then go out for a beer.
Shine bright like Iyanden
Shine bright like Iyanden