| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/27 19:31:49
Subject: The Phoenix bomber - any good?
|
 |
Liche Priest Hierophant
|
Hello. I am wondering if the phoenix bomber for the eldars and the eldar corsairs is anygood? 225 points is very expensive.
I am also a bit uncertain on the role it has? Is it an all around fighter? Shuriken cannon and phoenix missil launcher vs infantery and shuriken cannon and bright/pulse laser vs transports? also, it can only shoot 4 of it's five weapons, it seems a bitt odd.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/27 20:05:33
Subject: The Phoenix bomber - any good?
|
 |
Proud Phantom Titan
|
After digging out my IA 11 ... no its too confused as to its roll. what you really want is the cheaper Night wing intercept ... it has a pair of bright lances (& a pair of shuriken cannons). Only 145pts and it takes up a fast slot (rather then a heavy). It fills roll of anti air and can help with anti tank.
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/10/27 20:11:16
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/27 20:11:43
Subject: The Phoenix bomber - any good?
|
 |
Liche Priest Hierophant
|
The nightfighter is indeed the better step brother. However, the phoenix bomber has strafing runn, and it can pump out an ungodly amount of shots at BS 5 with those rockets. It will destroy one unit each turn.
It might actualy be really good, provided you can clear away other sky-fire units.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/27 20:31:30
Subject: The Phoenix bomber - any good?
|
 |
Proud Phantom Titan
|
Niiai wrote:The nightfighter is indeed the better step brother. However, the phoenix bomber has strafing runn, and it can pump out an ungodly amount of shots at BS 5 with those rockets. It will destroy one unit each turn.
It might actualy be really good, provided you can clear away other sky-fire units.
Want anti infantry? Why are you not using any wasps? Ok you'll need some scoring troop as well but these guys are cheap, with good BS and lots of dakka.
Or you pick the firestorm which also has lots of dakka anti air and TL-BS4 (88.8%) which is better then BS5 (83.3%) and is on the board turn one
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/27 20:40:15
Subject: The Phoenix bomber - any good?
|
 |
Liche Priest Hierophant
|
I am planing of adding them to a an existing dark eldar army. Trying to survive first turn, and come on board second turn with a lott of bad mojo.
Also, the firestorm is very expensive. The Phoenix bomber can put down an enormus amount of punishment.
I cannot decide if the phoenix missiles are good (hello space marines) or the nightfire blast AP5 ignores cover. It supose it depends on the rest of the list. Dark Eldars usualy only have problems with IG.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/27 22:15:59
Subject: The Phoenix bomber - any good?
|
 |
Proud Phantom Titan
|
Niiai wrote:I am planing of adding them to a an existing dark eldar army. Trying to survive first turn, and come on board second turn with a lott of bad mojo.
Also, the firestorm is very expensive. The Phoenix bomber can put down an enormus amount of punishment.
I cannot decide if the phoenix missiles are good (hello space marines) or the nightfire blast AP5 ignores cover. It supose it depends on the rest of the list. Dark Eldars usualy only have problems with IG.
If dark eldar are struggling to kill GEQ your doing it wrong. AP3 all the way, though i still think there are better ways.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/27 23:45:47
Subject: The Phoenix bomber - any good?
|
 |
Liche Priest Hierophant
|
Exuse me? Guardmen are the dark eldars worst enemy. They have cheap autocannons, and poison against them is just as eficient as theyr lasguns are against dark eldar. Only we pay a premium for it.
When it comes to vehicles ouer toys breaks easier then their toys.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/28 13:16:46
Subject: The Phoenix bomber - any good?
|
 |
Proud Phantom Titan
|
I don' think there is an army that can out shoot guard. However anything other the 30-50 strong blobs can be melee to death by a single unit.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/28 16:08:34
Subject: Re:The Phoenix bomber - any good?
|
 |
Power-Hungry Cultist of Tzeentch
|
I run a Phoenix (occasionally paired with a Nightwing) in my Craftworld Eldar army. I have it outfitted with the twin-linked Starcannon for anti-troop work. While the 6th change to fliers does obviate one of its weapons, I have found the Phoenix to be, while expensive, absolutely brutal in mowing down infantry (the Nightwing I use for anti-vehicle and anti-flyer support). I have plenty of additional anti-tank already.
Even Marines will not enjoy an encounter with the bomber's Phoenix missile bays and starcannon, while the shuriken cannons can be used for rear hits on enemy vehicles or light troops. And if you're going to face a cover-hugging horde army, than the Nightfire missile upgrade is going to reduce even the largest blobs to scattered remains in short order. 6 3" blasts with Ignores Cover and Pinning? Yes'm.
Added to its Vector Dancer and Shrouded (for a lovely 3+ Jink save) means even when (not if, when) the enemy throws everything they have at it, it more often than not comes through unscathed.
In the end, however, it all comes down to personal taste... expensive - yes. Low AV - yes. Very specific mission role - yes.
But I still loves me my Phoenix.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|