Switch Theme:

Sanguinary Guard Origins  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Dakka Veteran





College Park, MD

Are.Sanguinary Guard a Ward invention or have they been around for awhile? They dont seem especially silly so I'm not sure its a huge issue but I'm curious.

 
   
Made in au
Regular Dakkanaut





They're new with the 5th ed codex.
   
Made in us
The Conquerer






Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios

Of course the BAs really didn't have much of a codex prior to this one. So their fluff was fairly lacking.

Just like GKs, who had next to nothing.


The Black Templars had more fluff then BAs and GKs combined before their new codices.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/10/30 02:20:42


Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines

Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.

MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Sanguinary_Guard#.UI9NN8XA_X4

My Armies:
5,500pts
2,700pts
2,000pts


 
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran





College Park, MD

Thanks. I had checked out the lexicanum article (actually the wikia one... the color scheme on lexicanum is terrible) which matched up with the codex, but I wasn't sure if there were extra details that didn't make it in.

 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Background
Go to: