Switch Theme:

Debate: should Britian apologise for having invaded 90% of the world's countries?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Roaring Reaver Rider






Warwickshire

No never.

Half of these invasions were pirates, which was commonplace at the time.

A lot of them have also invaded us.
Made in gb
Roaring Reaver Rider






Warwickshire

Palindrome wrote:
 nomsheep wrote:

A lot of them have also invaded us.


It really depends on what you mean by Britain. Even so after 1066 England was only invaded by the Scots, French, Spaniards and the Dutch with only the latter being succesful.

The united kingdom has never been invaded (aside from a few French troops that fought in the Jacobite rebellion).



this list goes back to 200ad apparently, so vikings, Anglo-Saxons, ww2 germany etc

and I mean Britain as in England, Scotland and wales.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/11/07 12:33:33


 
Made in gb
Roaring Reaver Rider






Warwickshire

 Albatross wrote:
And Northern Ireland.


as far as I understand great britain is them three. the u.k is the all of them.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/11/07 13:04:21


 
Made in gb
Roaring Reaver Rider






Warwickshire

Palindrome wrote:
Ireland is one of the British isles and Northern Ireland is part of the United Kingdom so I don't see why NI shouldn't be considered part of Britain.
I'm not sure either, i think it's cos the first three are on the same island.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:
I apologise for starting this thread

Could have been soooo much worse.

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2012/11/07 13:53:08


 
Made in gb
Roaring Reaver Rider






Warwickshire

does this mean we invaded the arctic and Antarctic?
Made in gb
Roaring Reaver Rider






Warwickshire

 Grey Templar wrote:
 master of ordinance wrote:
Spoiler:
 Grey Templar wrote:
 master of ordinance wrote:
 Frazzled wrote:
 master of ordinance wrote:
Apologise?!?!?!?!?! NEVER unless you mean apologising for abadoning the Empire. That was a bad move ill admit

Allright we will only apologise if the US apologises for justin beiber(cursed and dammed be its name) first.......


Justin Bieber is Canadian.
Now the UK must apolagize to the US for that statement.


What-Damn!!!!

[Redirects orbital bombardment to canada]

Well you still have to apologise for the jonas brothers



Don't make me pull out Snooki!

Hmmm, "Manchester Shore"

Has a nice ring to it don't you think?

NNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Manchesters right next to where my GF lives...... Grey Templar do not make me unleash the ninja kittens


Muwhahahaha

Do you truly think Ninja Kittens can defeat Snooki?


I sincerely hope so or we are all doomed.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 ExNoctemNacimur wrote:
 nomsheep wrote:
does this mean we invaded the arctic and Antarctic?


They're not countries.


yes but have we invaded them? they are still landmasses with people on em, or at least one of them is.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/11/08 16:12:46


 
Made in gb
Roaring Reaver Rider






Warwickshire

 Kilkrazy wrote:
The Arctic is a geographical designation. Britain has invaded a number of places within the Arctic Circle, such as Norway.


okay, thanks.
Made in gb
Roaring Reaver Rider






Warwickshire

 GalacticDefender wrote:
Thats why we should get rid of countries all together and have some sort of global government run by the UN or something. Lol that would never happen (at least not for a REALLLY long time) but it would be awesome.

Well it's really not that far fetched I guess, seeing as the US is made up of a bunch of states and governed by one Government, and many countries are not much larger than the individual states.


thousands of years of history would stop that happening, just as a start most British people wouldn't agree to it.
Made in gb
Roaring Reaver Rider






Warwickshire

 GalacticDefender wrote:
But a few hundred year in the future, as everything becomes more and more globalized, I could see that happening, or at least being considered. Though Earth/Mars relations might be the key subject then. (Not joking)


if and when we reach mars or discover other species, we may unite against them though it's unlikely.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/11/09 00:22:02


 
Made in gb
Roaring Reaver Rider






Warwickshire

 GalacticDefender wrote:
I think humans might eventually unite. Look at the progress in the last 10 thousand years or so: We went from hunter gatherers, to warring city states, and now we have continent spanning governments that are quite effective (not to mention that we went from drawing pictures on cave walls to landing rovers on mars). Give us another few thousand years, who knows what we can accomplish. I've actually got quite a bit of confidence in Humanity.

As Darwin said,
"it is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the most responsive to change"

We happen to be good at all three of those things. We are strong, (or at least our tech makes us strong), we are intelligent (comparably lol), and we are quite responsive to change, even if it does often mean a war starts. War is something we will never completely eliminate, because conflict comes from such a basic, instinctual level. Otherwise, humanity FTW!


while I don't think it will happen without a extreme cause, I still it would be awesome if it did. Imagine the technology, art and literature we could all focus on if we weren't busy fighting over lines drawn on a map.
Made in gb
Roaring Reaver Rider






Warwickshire

 Kilkrazy wrote:
 GalacticDefender wrote:
Thats why we should get rid of countries all together and have some sort of global government run by the UN or something. Lol that would never happen (at least not for a REALLLY long time) but it would be awesome.

Well it's really not that far fetched I guess, seeing as the US is made up of a bunch of states and governed by one Government, and many countries are not much larger than the individual states.


There already is a global government run by the UN, but it is a deep conspiracy and as such they -- our secret masters, I mean -- have cunningly allowed nation states to continue as a means of covering up the true state of affairs.


shush, don't let people know...
Made in gb
Roaring Reaver Rider






Warwickshire

last ones I know of are India and Somalia in the late fifties/early sixties

Somalia Source

Edit: Though Somalia (Somaliland) is a relatively good example of a country that was better off within the empire.

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2012/11/09 17:16:20


 
Made in gb
Roaring Reaver Rider






Warwickshire

 Orlanth wrote:
However Hong Kong would want to stay with the UK over the alternative.


Depends, We aren't really that great.
 
Forum Index » Off-Topic Forum
Go to: