Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Night Fighting: "Units between 12" and up to 24" away are instead treated as having the Stealth special rule."

Counter Tactics: "At the start of each of your turns in which Zahndrekh is on the battlefield, choose one enemy unit within his line of sight. That unit loses the following special rules (if it has them), and cannot gain them until the start of your next turn: [...] Stealth [...]."

So, Can Zahndrekh remove "Stealth" from units that gain it with Night Fighting.

Does "treated as having" is the same as "has"?

Yes... note the "cannot gain" part of his rule. This would be determined when range was measured.

Fragile wrote:
Yes... note the "cannot gain" part of his rule. This would be determined when range was measured.

So then a model without a specified CCW and is treated as having a CCW would have an actual CCW. Which means they do not get a CCW which means they have a CCW..going in circles. Head hurts. Too much beer (or not enough0.

Fragile wrote:
Yes... note the "cannot gain" part of his rule. This would be determined when range was measured.

Good point.
so now the question is, does "gain" and "treated as having" is the same? kidding

Thank you for your answer.